Traceroute Vs. nmap --traceroute discrepency

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Searching_ _ _, Jan 20, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Searching_ _ _

    Searching_ _ _ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Posts:
    1,988
    Location:
    iAnywhere
    Running traceroute from a console for any url, the trace doesn't complete, giving asterisks for the last few hops.
    Running the same url with nmap --traceroute it is able to complete the trace.

    It always seems to have a problem when it reaches MCI , Splice Technologies in VA.
    It also appears that certain url's always go through this particular hop.

    Should these two programs be consistent in reporting results?

    Code:
    # traceroute www.google.com
    traceroute to www.google.com (208.69.32.231), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    
     8  65.222.158.82 (65.222.158.82)  17.353 ms  17.433 ms  17.400 ms
     9  * * *
    
    Code:
    # nmap --traceroute www.google.com
    
    Warning: Hostname www.google.com resolves to 2 IPs. Using 208.69.32.230.
    Interesting ports on google.navigation.opendns.com (208.69.32.230):
    
    TRACEROUTE 
    HOP RTT   ADDRESS
    
    9   17.20 POS6-0.GW4.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.41.29)
    10  14.49 65.222.158.82
    11  16.68 google.navigation.opendns.com (208.69.32.230)
    
     
  2. nineine

    nineine Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Posts:
    140
    Why does google.navigation.opendns.com show the google search homepage? Does google own opendns? I thought google has its own googledns.
     
  3. whitedragon551

    whitedragon551 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Posts:
    3,264
    Location:
    USA
    Id go with nmap over Traceroute. Much more accurate.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.