Superantispyware Killed my Computer

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Makav3l1, Jan 27, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Makav3l1

    Makav3l1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Posts:
    241
    Yes this is what happened to me. I am back up and running thanks to the vista recovery cd. I am however disappointed in SAS. I used to recommend the free scanner to friends of mine but I don't think I can do that anymore. Bad FP. Thanks to all the members for the help they provided.
     
  2. IceCube1010

    IceCube1010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Posts:
    963
    Location:
    Earth
    This is where Prevention is better than the cure.

    Ice
     
  3. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    IMO I will not attempt a nuke it all scanner method,well for entertainment maybe.There is always a chance a nuke it takes the OS with it.I would just resort to a rescue area or offline image and in most cases better outcome and piece of mind its gone,of course providing the image is clean.
     
  4. Makav3l1

    Makav3l1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Posts:
    241
    Just so we're on the same page. My issue was a confirmed SAS false positive. Anyone who scanned with those file definitions (on vista?) and went through the removal process was going to end up with a bsod.
     
  5. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    This was very careless of SUPERAntiSpyware, or more specifically the definition building department...

    I would imagine this was a big step backwards for them, and hopefully they learned something from this false positive, and moving forward with better means to avoid this in the future such severe fp detections on critical system files...

    If they make a habit of having false positives on critical system files, ... then sure ditch them, don't recommend them, and move forward.


    But also this should hopefully bring awareness to being more careful to what you choose to remove, especially things from your system directory. Do research on the detected files, get secondary opinion, or third ... Ensure they aren't part of Microsoft before you get click happy...


    Makav3l1, I'm very happy to see you have this worked out, and back up and running again. You have a good one!


    Bests Regards,
    Phant0m``
     
  6. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks Makav for the heads up,and sure goes to show how a FP can be very destructive,regardless of OS.Glad to hear your back to normal.
     
  7. Longboard

    Longboard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Posts:
    3,238
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Yep..me too..FP Vundo on a system file:

    Multiple FPs for Vundo detection on SAS forums after latest updates.
    Glad the issue is sorted for the OP: if you are a 'reasonable' surfer and have some 'anti' apps in place, be careful with any detectioins +/- auto deletes.
    I for one wouldn't junk SAS because of a couple of FPs. ??

    Tricky balance btwn over and under detecting.
    No scanner is perfect.
    LOL, bet Nick is a bit red faced about these fp's.
    Doubtless he'll be workin away...

    Before deleting ANYTHING You could always search the web for the file name or .dll , .exe or whatever. Could post at malware removal forums..
    Repeat scan with another online scanner or another app: PrevXCSI, MBAM etc etc

    Get Process Explorer and Autoruns from Sysinternals not hard to use, free, powerful utilities.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/default.aspx
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/0e18b180-9b7a-4c49-8120-c47c5a693683.aspx
    Get Runscanner
    http://www.runscanner.net/
    Another incredibly useful tool when you need it.

    It's so effing annoying that the Op had to learn the hardway, but, a great recovery :thumb: :thumb:
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2009
  8. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Nice post longboard and great points indeed,Beside the fact SAS have Saved Some Arses for many that came in here for help in this case it was a oops we all know it happens from time to time.
     
  9. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    You realize it's the malware, not SAS doing the damage right? I am always amazed when "technical" people have no notion that the spyware can harm the system when removed - it can happen with any product, we see this in our labs all the time and go to great extents to protect against and repair damages caused by malware/spyware.

    You would rather bash a product than find a solution and learn techniques yourself to help remedy the situation. Remember, products such as SAS, MBAM, CounterSpy, etc. don't remove anything unless YOU direct it to.......
     
  10. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    Incorrect. Only certain (very few) Vista systems have this problem - we of course scan against dozens of in-house and thousands of out of house systems before doing any releases.
     
  11. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    You do realize that we have VERY FEW false positives in over 14 million users and years in the business. This was an issue that was located and resolved immediately. EVERY product has had issues such as this, AVG, MBAM, McAfee, etc. have ALL removed things they should not have and caused more widespread problems that this issue caused.
     
  12. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    Any security product you use that is going to be "worth its weight" will eventually have a serious false positive - if you look back historically, any high profile product that is on the bleeding edge like we are will eventually have a false positive like this (or much worse as has been seen) i.e. AVG has, MBAM has, SpyBot has, AdAware has, etc.

    It's part of the "risk" - We work very hard (as other companies do) to stay on the bleeding edge of these threats - things can happen - this didn't erase data, nor wipe the system and was easily fixed with the recovery CD - exactly why there IS a recovery CD - things happen.
     
  13. Makav3l1

    Makav3l1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Posts:
    241
    Well I guess that is an easy fix. I also had to reflash my bios as it was acting weird by not saving settings after this happened. I don't know that the average computer user is going to know how to do these things. I also don't like that I don't know if there are any other lingering issues. As it stands, I am glad there weren't too many systems that this FP affected.
     
  14. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Well If I didn't ... I would have been like the others on here telling this user to ditch the **** and find something better...

    .. I don't even want to read statistics, an critical system file shouldn't have been detected as a threat in the first place, hopefully instead of wasting your valuable time on here counteracting the aftermath.., you making steps to ensure this less likely to happen in the future on critical system files.

    ... I wonder the statistics regarding how many people because of this had to do Windows System Restore, or even re-format and reinstall Windows, or re-imaging of the hard drive to an earlier state to recover. I bet very limited numbers actually knew how to visit the Recovery Console and extract the right missing file off of the Windows CD/DVD and place back into their system. Let's not forget, not everyone has Windows CD/DVD with their computer...


     
  15. Phant0m

    Phant0m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    3,726
    Location:
    Canada
    Makav3l1, The removal of the system file didn't cause BIOS problems, .. if you had BIOS problems... wasn't because of SUPERAntiSpyware or it's cleaning .. or should I say removing? :p


     
  16. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,941
    Location:
    USA
    This thread is about a bad FP from your software. What malware are you talking about?
     
  17. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    i dont think it was an FP, i think it was the malware rooted into a system file. i may be wrong however.
     
  18. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,941
    Location:
    USA
  19. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    The example I gave was caused by the Grandchild trojan, on my Daughter's computer. Since, I have installed Returnil and instructed them to enable it every time they go online. So far so good. :p
     
  20. Perman

    Perman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2005
    Posts:
    2,161
    Hi,

    Just can not afford another BSOD, especially being caused by a top notched application.

    Just remembered being told that flying high, falling deep. SAS is, still (?) the number one in AS field ?

    Feeling lucky and safer by adopting sandbox/virtualization concept long time ago.

    When feel like to do "the catch of day" exercise, I will bring out SAS. MBAM or their likes for the fun. Not even bothering their real time stuff any more. --window dressing stuff.
     
  21. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    SUPERAntiSpyware didn't cause you to reflash your bios! There are not lingering issues - it was ONE file that was removed, which you resotred. It's funny how people blame SAS (and other products) for the most amazing things....my car wouldn't start after I installed your software, my dog ran away after installing your software, etc.... :)
     
  22. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    Yes, it happens with every tool. Not a SAS specific problem. That's why you, the developers of any antimalware tool, should give a warning to people before eliminating anything your tools detect, to seek for advice on the official forum and not eliminate anything on their own, as we could be talking about a FP, that if eliminated, it could damage the system, which only a repair or even reinstall would fix.

    Note, that, many users, are unknowledgeable people. If they see that their antimalware tool, that probably got installed when they bought their PC, report any malware activity, they will freak out and eliminate it.

    You guys should make your products alert people for that fact, and ask for support on your official forums, and direct them the best way possible.

    Regards
     
  23. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    Nothing is removed without permission and we have an "Explain" button for people to get more information.........
     
  24. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    Yes, I'm aware of that. But, unfortunately, not enough. A clear warning, and I'm not specifically targeting SAS, as it is a general situation, after a system scanning, if anything found, antimalware tools should give a warning to the users saying not to remove anything, before seeking advice in the official forum, or any other type of support.

    This type of measure will prevent people from damaging their systems by eliminating things that could be the result of a FP, or from a true malware, but that could do what just happened.

    Not everyone has the knowledge to do it on their own and know where to get help. And as I mentioned, if a user who has an antimalware tool, which got installed when bought the PC, scans the system because the guy at the computer shop said it so, and if the malware finds anything, he/she will delete it right away, scared of being a virus or spyware, etc. Unless, they know someone who is knowledgeable, which could help him/her out and advice what to do or where to seek for help.

    I really think that's the best approach.

    Best regards
     
  25. SUPERAntiSpy

    SUPERAntiSpy Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Posts:
    1,088
    You realize with the 10's of millions of scans done DAILY by users worldwide, that would never work right?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.