SAS Fail

I am still the developer and continue to improve our product I am honest and understand the reality that a single solution is not enough - we are ONE of the solutions!

 

who gives a rats arse about mrg tests? i certainly dont, in MY testing SAS has performed brilliantly at removing stuff others miss, excellent software

 

I have Licenses for both MBAM and SAS.
I've used them both to Fight Infections and Clean Systems.
No one is perfect; no one catches all malware.
That's why we are using a variety of Tools...

 

Every software goes through its ebbs and flows. We see this literally all the time with different AV comparatives. There's always a "shocker" where some company just slipped behind for a while or suddenly started picking it up.

That's just how it works.

 

How about we just not use the product if we no longer believe in it, instead of going back and forth with the dev? It's quite obvious to me, from looking at dev responses so far, that he's sticking to his guns and frankly just repeating the same thing. Dev: "We'll improve", Poster: "I don't believe you", that's really all this is turning into. Btw, who bloody cares about SuperAdBlocker anyway? Browsers now are able to do it themselves.

 

I tend to agree, SAS works well enough & for quite a few people I've recommended it to. It's found & removed malware for me in the past. Furthermore I have had no false-positives with it in three years of use. I had far too many with MBAM, which may find more malware, but I started not to trust it after a while.

... *Dons steel helmet, runs into fallout bunker & waits for the MBAM Taliban to attack me* ...

 

with some ot posts removed and nothing to be gained from having this thread open.....