ProcessGuard v3.410 - SHA1 / MD5

Can anybody please provide a valid SHA1 or MD5 checksum for the ProcessGuard v3.410 setup file. I still have my unlimited license key but I no longer have the setup file. I have sent emails to DiamondCS requesting the file but I have had no response. I have found another copy from a non-reliable source, but I would like to validate the files integrity before I install it.

The original download link is dead.

http://www.diamondcs.com.au/processguard/pgsetup.exe

Thanks.

 

Greetings and a warm good weekend to you LinuxKungFu

Welcome​

All this is very disturbing because these very useful and proven dependable apps are surprisingly slipping into the TwilightZone time and again. I refer also to FirstDefense-ISR in this mix.

I hope only encouraging news in response to your request but seems like some BEST of the BEST apps are rapidly falling off from it's customers/users radar screen as of late.

I share your concerns and wish you all the luck for a satisfactory answer.

With Kindest Regards

EASTER

 

All I need is for somebody who has the original ProcessGuard v3.410 setup file to generate the SHA1 or MD5 checksum and post the results here.

The checksums of my setup file are as follows...

SHA1: f18364516e62511cd9a0a214e82679a93b6eb8
a0
MD5: 6736eea11c739e945c51a79fd4587e09

Thanks.

 

The MD5 checksum available on the DiamondCS site is for the freeware version v3.150 and not for the latest version.

Thanks.

 

Here ya go man MD5

6736EEA11C739E945C51A79FD4587E09


controler

 

Peter

What are the newer better programs?

 

Controler, thanks for the MD5 checksum.

It confirms that my setup file is valid.

LinuxKungFu

 

Yup I tried SSM and Online Armor not EQsecure or Prosecurity.

I know SSM in not for novice users, at least PG was a bit more user friendly.
It is too bad DCS gave up. They did know how to program and usually were way ahead of the competition in advanced software.

I wonder how the new ones work against the new Rustock versions?

controler

 

As antiexecutables, classical HIPS have demostrated to be 100 % bullet-proof.
When malware is loaded into memory, some HIPS might fail to detect some attempts to subvert the system.

 

Really Jason?

You don't think Wayne could program? Not to mention Gavin. LOL

If you know something the rest of us don't know about DCS please share. I did not see you mention any of Jasons programs in your list of great programs.

controler

 

Bad guys.

Indeed. Lol.
But I also like this relict from the past, I was deeply involved in this period of first anti-rootkits that massively enforced my interest in IT security since then.

Process Guard is still a nice anti-bifrost tool.

 

I still have Process Guard and it works. Does it need to be replaced?

"Process Guard is still a nice anti-bifrost tool".
What does that mean?

Isn't Online Armor a full firewall? It could not be used with ZA free?

And does it have a stealth mode in the fre version?

Thanks

David

 

Bifrost trojan if executed will brute force unhook PG's SSDT hooks effectively wiping out its control capabilities.

That said a PG user with execution control enabled would still have to *allow* the trojan code to execute in the first place for this to become an issue

PG is still the *big iron* for executable files