I tried the beta with GW since I have a license for both; and prevx doesn't appear to protect the browser beyond the current malware detection. I tried creating a rule for http://* domains and still prevx didn't do anything besides putting a tab above the address bar. I suppose this should be expected since the protection is overlapping, so to speak. When I uninstall GW prevx browser protection works fine. It would be awsome if the two could work together since prevx has some browser protection functions that GW doesn't.
Ah, yes... I see what you mean. This is all that I get with GeSWall and the new Prevx Web Browser Security (see this thread post). But if I run my browser as not isolated in GeSWall, then I experience the functionality that this new Prevx offers. I'd like you to explain the secure browser functions that Prevx offers that GW doesn't, if you would, please.
We have added GeSWall to our list of programs to test against and will be hopefully correcting compatibility in the next version Thank you for the information!
That's good news. The beta seems to work fine with Defensewall though, at least in the limited time I've been working with this beta. I appreciate how responsive Prevx is to their customers keep up the good work!
Cool. I look forward to hearing what you find. And what of the drag and drop browser tab? Did that get added?
Update: With Prevx release 3.0.4.195 the prevx tab is unable to provide host name, IP, etc. unless a rule is added to GW resources. The prevx.exe needs to be identified in GW as a system file before it can display info in the prevx tab. Running prevx.exe as a trusted resource doesn't seem to grant the privileges necessary for it to function properly. But I am by no means an expert on this. Path: C:\Program Files\Prevx\prevx.exe File System
