Panda Internet Security 2007 - Save 20%

Chubb · Feb 28, 2007

Panda Internet Security 2007 - Save 20%

Regular Price: $69.95
20% Discount: $13.99
Special Offer: $55.96

https://shop.pandasoftware.com/carr...a&unidades=1&pais=63&idioma=en-us&track=31165

C.S.J · Feb 28, 2007

or ...ebay for about 1/10 of that

Frank the Perv · Feb 28, 2007

I would'nt let my dog use Panda Internet Security.

Any AV that is afraid of the results of IBK's tests is an AV to be avoided.

That's what I always say.

When I trialed Panda, it was much like the Panda at the DC zoo. It stunk up the place and left a big mess behind.

After the Panda trial, my registry looked like Panda poo.

C.S.J · Feb 28, 2007

i dont agree frank,

panda is a good AV ... like norton, 2007 is a good year for them.

andyangela · Mar 1, 2007

That's it, panda is a good AV.

Frank the Perv · Mar 1, 2007

AV software inadequate protection against exploits

Products fail to detect targeted Office exploits. Faster patching needed.

Research conducted by AV-Test.org has revealed a large and worrying variation in the detection by anti-malware products of Microsoft Office files carrying exploits. Catch rates for anti-virus products range from 96% to just 12.83%.

The tests, published in German magazine PC Welt, analysed the detection of over 800 exploits for vulnerabilities in Microsoft's Office software, many of which were in the public arena but remained unpatched at the time of testing.

The test set included several samples targeting the string of Microsoft Word flaws revealed in the last few months.

The top performers were WebWasher and G DATA's AntiVirusKit 2006, which both caught over 96% of the sample exploits. Close behind were Avira AntiVir and Symantec AntiVirus, also above 90%, while BitDefender, Kaspersky, F-Secure and McAfee products all achieved over 80%.

Catching just over 89% of the sample exploits, G DATA's AntiVirusKit 2007 performed somewhat less well than the previous (2006) version of the product, thanks to a change in one of the scanning engines used.

At the other end of the scale, Grisoft AVG, Panda, CAT Quick Heal and ClamAV were among many scoring below 40%, with VirusBuster bottom of the class on 12.82%.
Click to expand...

No AV test is perfect apparently.

But it doesn't matter, because Panda stinks in all of them.

MalwareDie · Mar 1, 2007

Can you give the lnik I would like to see it.

Frank the Perv · Mar 1, 2007

http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f240/gengt/vpanda/pixel_panda_poop.gif

My Panda-poo avatar is not working correctly.

I wonder why?

C.S.J · Mar 1, 2007

well after trying a few AV's on vista, currently OneCare, im going back to panda 2007, it runs the best out of the few ive tried on vista, so i dont understand your negative comments, i know panda doesnt have a 99.5% detection rate, i believe it will be about 92%, which i still think is good, and good enough to protect, the 2007 version is soooo light, and works flawlessly with vista, not many can say that yet.

Log in or Sign up

Panda Internet Security 2007 - Save 20%

Chubb Registered Member

Attached Files:

Panda Security.PNG

C.S.J Massive Poster

Frank the Perv Banned

C.S.J Massive Poster

andyangela Registered Member

Frank the Perv Banned

MalwareDie Registered Member

Frank the Perv Banned

C.S.J Massive Poster

Log in or Sign up

Panda Internet Security 2007 - Save 20%

Chubb Registered Member

Attached Files:

Panda Security.PNG

C.S.J Massive Poster

Frank the Perv Banned

C.S.J Massive Poster

andyangela Registered Member

Frank the Perv Banned

MalwareDie Registered Member

Frank the Perv Banned

C.S.J Massive Poster

Useful Searches