Online Armor - Public Beta

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by subset, Aug 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. alex_s

    alex_s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Posts:
    1,251
    www.matousec.com
    perfudp, perftcp

    Edit: but you need to turn off web shield to get correct result with published beta. I reported this bug to Mike and he said it will be fixed before release.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2008
  2. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Has anyone used this OA beta while surfing with Firefox or K-meleon in Sandboxie? I seemed to lose my connections at such times. Anyone else?
     
  3. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I surf with Firefox via Sanboxie with this beta just fine.

    Pete
     
  4. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    I think he was just joking! :)
     
  5. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Hi Mike, don,t take my comments serious. It was more of a joke( but the features of OA I mentioned really I liked a lot).

    About clean PC mode, it,s a great idea indeed. I really like it. :thumb: There is one small issue. What if I want to trust only my OS partition/ drive( C). I have many malware samples collected on no-OS partitions. MAy be an idea for some future version.

    BTW please have a look on my post about pop ups GUI. It will be really nice to make applications involved bold and prominant just like SSM, EQS, PS etc do. U can read application anme n icon just on a glance. I am not sure if u can agree with this or not?
     
  6. SystemJunkie

    SystemJunkie Resident Conspiracy Theorist

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Posts:
    1,500
    Location:
    Germany
    Seems to be difficult for companies to adapt to 64 bit. Comodo still far ahead.
     
  7. MikeNash

    MikeNash Security Expert

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Posts:
    1,658
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Hi Aigle,

    We're not going to change popups before release - but it is on our TODO list to improve them. Aside from bolding and emphasis, we want to improve them in other ways too.


    Mike
     
  8. subset

    subset Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Posts:
    825
    Location:
    Austria
    Many vendors do not offer a 64 bit version for various reasons.
    But I assume it's basically caused by the market share of 64-Bit Windows.
    Not every company can afford to develop software only to keep their fanboys happy. ;)

    Cheers
     
  9. MikeNash

    MikeNash Security Expert

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Posts:
    1,658
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    I wouldn't know - we haven't even looked at this yet.
     
  10. Fajo

    Fajo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,814

    No one cares about Comodo. go post your fan boy crap elsewhere. :mad:
     
  11. alex_s

    alex_s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Posts:
    1,251
    I agree, Comodo is far ahead in resources it can give away. But their "result / resources" ratio is close to zero taking in account that lot of useless toys they developed.
     
  12. Stem

    Stem Firewall Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Posts:
    4,948
    Location:
    UK
    Then my mistake.


    I agree with you on that point.

    - Stem
     
  13. larryb52

    larryb52 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Posts:
    1,131
    I'm glad to see this in beta & sorry I'm not home to install it :) , look forward to giving it a go, good job getting it to this point...it seems very stable from what I have read any problems with either threatfire or SAS?
     
  14. SamSpade

    SamSpade Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Posts:
    415

    I don't use Sandboxie at present, but I do use OA and Ffox 3.0.1 (NoScript, AdBlocker, Keyscrambler, Customize Google, Secure Log-in, WOT, and several others which should *not* impact surfing). Ever since the last several builds of OA and the advent of Ffox 3.x I've had slow downs in browser connections with many time-outs. More than 50% of all site calls are timing out on me. Never happened in earlier builds of OA when I was running Fox 2.xx. I've been trying to find the problem for some weeks now, but have yet to pinpoint it. So I'm not sure your issue is Sanboxie-related as much as it is something in the newer OA builds + the new Firefox engine (and/or extensions I mentioned).

    Sam
     
  15. Espresso

    Espresso Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Posts:
    976
    Disable NetBIOS and that should go away. That's assuming you don't need it.
     
  16. alex_s

    alex_s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Posts:
    1,251
    The first thing I'd try is to turn off web shield. If it helps then the problem is there. Web shield used to be a ... a bit troublesome part. BTW, you run it on XP or Vista ?
     
  17. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    That,s ok.

    And what about this?

    Thanks
     
  18. MikeNash

    MikeNash Security Expert

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Posts:
    1,658
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Hi Aigle,

    We don't have a clean pc mode per-se, what we have is a "Trust everything found in the wizard". We dont do a full disk scan an literally trust everything on the disk.

    Cheers

    Mike
     
  19. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    So it,s not possible to trust everything just on OS partition/ disk?

    Thanks
     
  20. MikeNash

    MikeNash Security Expert

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Posts:
    1,658
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    No, not possible. Unless you have your samples stored in a certain set of locations scanned by our safety check wizard (or run them during startup) they would not be trusted.

    I think in your case though, you would be a candidate for running the full wizard :)
     
  21. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Thanks Mike.
     
  22. subset

    subset Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Posts:
    825
    Location:
    Austria
    Hi,

    OA v3 comes with this new feature 'Direct disk access control'.
    But how do we know that it is working?
    Exactly... Trojan.Win32.KillMBR.f (Kaspersky)

    KillMBR.png

    Seems to work, at least with this rascal.

    Cheers
     
  23. Stem

    Stem Firewall Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Posts:
    4,948
    Location:
    UK
    A number of HIPS have this function. I would prefer that this would either be split to a read/write action, or simply have alert to write. Quite a number of applications will attempt to read low level disk simply to play media, but to allow them to also write would be of concern (of course IMHO)


    - Stem
     
  24. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Another new feature that should work with that rascal is go to the Programs tab, and under options, check RunSafer unknown options by default, and uncheck Prompt when running unknown program. Then try the trojan. No pop ups, no decision, but no damage either.

    Pete
     
  25. MikeNash

    MikeNash Security Expert

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Posts:
    1,658
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    We did alert on read in early builds, but this has been changed now so that we only alert on writes.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.