Norton vs ESET

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by cinek, Jan 11, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cinek

    cinek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    20
    I'm currently using ESS but I was thinking about using some other product (no reason). I used to have norton IS but it was slowing down my pc..... Has any1 been using the new norton internet security 2009? Can any1 tell me if it's better? Does it still slow down the pc? Is it better @ scanning then ess?
     
    cinek, Jan 11, 2009
    #1
  2. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    hmm, i can see that this thread will probably be closed.
     
    firzen771, Jan 11, 2009
    #2
  3. cinek

    cinek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    20
    why? :O
     
    cinek, Jan 11, 2009
    #3
  4. ThunderZ

    ThunderZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,459
    Location:
    North central Ohio, U.S.A.
    If responders do not tread lightly with their answers. The topic is right in line with an A vs B flaming thread.
     
    ThunderZ, Jan 11, 2009
    #4
  5. virtumonde

    virtumonde Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    504
    Before someone closes the thread ,Yes Norton 2009 is very fast,it is much improved than previous Versions ,regarding CPU,Ram,even detection.
     
    virtumonde, Jan 11, 2009
    #5
  6. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    18,280
    Location:
    New England
    There's no option for even "treading lightly" in a purely "this vs that" thread.

    Policy from Sticky thread at top of this forum section:

    General Policy & Recommended Threads

    As for specific questions regarding the new Norton, there are already several threads right in this section, on the first two pages, that are all about the improvements made in the new version of Norton this year.
     
    LowWaterMark, Jan 11, 2009
    #6
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...