Need a couple sites with anti-malware comparisons..

Retadpuss · Jun 22, 2009

Dr who said:

This is classic SSUPDATER testing mentality,integrity and logic summed up.

MZ requested from littlebytes after hearing that a2 struggled to remove malware that it detected from an infected machine to check a2 ability to remove detected malware or whether it was true.

Littlebytes then scans his folder of inactive malware samples and confirms that a2 does indeed remove all that it detects from that folder.

Max Zorin is then very satisfied and everyone congratulate Littlebytes for his marvelous testing and glories that the reports from the real world are all false

One big problem shills and fanboys of SSUPDATER

That was not what a2 was accused of under performing it was removing malware that was active on a pc so in fact that rather makes MZ look like an idiot for accepting they were valid tests of the software ability to remove from an infected machine and Littlebytes incapable or unwilling of testing on an infected machine in the first place.

Gizmo however tests antimalwares versus live malware infections now that is what you call real world testing with real world results

Which is it SSUPDATER/Littlebytes and Redapuss are you incapable of dealing with live malware testing or just dont want to get egg on your faces when you suddenly realize there is more than 1 dimension to malware and antimalware software and it a whole lot more complicated then inactives files sat in a holding folder....

HTH
Click to expand...

Not sure what your point is really. The question was about sites that conduct malware testing wasnt it? I gave two sites that run these tests. One of these sites conducts live / infected system rescue tests:

http://malwareresearchgroup.com/?page_id=186

No idea what your rant is about - however, I do notice that you have four posts here and in all of them, you quote me and make some similarly silly comment. Very interesting and good to see you are contributing to the group / a valued member!

LOL

jrmhng · Jun 21, 2009

Vikorr said:

You're trying to guage the validity of one article on the strength of other articles that he's written? That's...odd.

As for writing about the size of the install file, so what? There's a wealth of other valid information in that lengthy article - it makes it seem that you want to dismiss that for a, what, pet peeve?

-though as a matter of interest (while the size of the install file for Prevx may say nothing about it's ability), the size of the install file for Prevx is actually very noteworthy.
Click to expand...

If one writer consistently writes poor reviews that generally touch on relevant issues so that the mags will well the I presume most of his reviews are crap. If you like what he writes then thats fine.

prairie dog said:

This makes no sense when talking about techsupportalert since all they review is freeware
Click to expand...

He just compares features. Just not a big fan of these guys.

All in all, trust avcomparatives and avtest rather than these guys who really havent got a clue abt security.

Someone · Jun 21, 2009

huangker said:

He just compares features. Just not a big fan of these guys.
Click to expand...

The editor of the antispyware page had done a test, not just compare features.

Log in or Sign up

Need a couple sites with anti-malware comparisons..

Retadpuss Suspended Member

jrmhng Registered Member

Someone Registered Member

Log in or Sign up

Need a couple sites with anti-malware comparisons..

Retadpuss Suspended Member

jrmhng Registered Member

Someone Registered Member

Useful Searches