Microsoft Security Bulletin Advance Notification for May 2012

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by ronjor, May 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    53,132
    Location:
    Texas
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-may
     
  2. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    53,132
    Location:
    Texas
    https://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/ar...ecurity-bulletin-release.aspx?Redirected=true
     
  3. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    Looks like another relatively quiet month for XP, especially if you don't have Office, Silverlight, or NET.
     
  4. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    53,132
    Location:
    Texas
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-may

    See Executive Summaries within the bulletin
     
  5. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    53,132
    Location:
    Texas
    https://blogs.technet.com/b/msrc/?Redirected=true
     
  6. FanJ

    FanJ Updates Team

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    2,348
    Thanks Ron and Nick :)
     
  7. siljaline

    siljaline Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,619
    All patched here - was not happy having to accept four .Net patches but since they are improtant I did install them.

    Thanks for keeping us up to speed.
     
  8. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    156
    Maybe a little OT, but why .NET updates take so long to install?
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2012
  9. siljaline

    siljaline Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,619
    Are we speaking of Windows XP or Windows 7 ? If your machine is perhaps a bit hard drive space challenged or memory challenged installation of .Net packages can take some time.
    I would not be too concerned unless the packages will not install correctly.
     
  10. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    156
    Thanks for your reply (as usual)
    On my (small) XP netbook, this 90 MB/11 "items" Microsoft Update took about 40 minutes to complete ;)
     
  11. siljaline

    siljaline Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,619
    Glad to be of assistance.

    • Hint • but don't tell anyone else - you can selectively install certain updates if you are aware they will be time consuming as is the case with .Net installations.

    This is generally not recommended but can be done without any ill effect on your PC. Ensure that all items Windows Update offers are installed in due haste.

     
  12. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    156
    Nah... my philosophy is to install everything contained in Microsoft update
    :thumb:
     
  13. kupo

    kupo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Posts:
    1,122
    I noticed that as well.
    Same here :D. Except for really little things like Bing Desktop
     
  14. MessageBoxA

    MessageBoxA Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Posts:
    52
    It takes a little longer to install the .NET packages because the .NET assemblies are not native binary code. When you install the .NET framework and/or updates a tool called NGEN.exe is executed and compiles the .NET assembles into native code specially tuned for your system and stores them into the 'native image cache'. Compiling the code takes a little time.

    Best Wishes,
    -MessageBoxA
     
  15. Dermot7

    Dermot7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,941
    Location:
    Surrey, England.
    Ah, thanks very much for the clear explanation, I've been wondering this myself for quite some time :thumb:
     
  16. Wallaby

    Wallaby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    156
    Thanks a lot for the explanation
    Now it is more clear :thumb:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.