MBAM 1.45 Released

You are welcome!

siljaline, does this cover things pretty well for you?

 

Thanks HAN. For sometime I thought something was seriously wrong with MBAM since it didn't autoupdate.

 

Hello Han,
Based on your screenshots, which I thank you for, all seems good to go.

Thanks !

 

I've spent some time on their forum,but found nothing...could someone tell me please (i stared and checked a lot the options) if MBAM does really have an exclude option?Like everyone else?Maybe an ADD button?To exclude the AV,and etc.......

 

True I see nothing Under the Ignore List Tab to be able to add an exclusion very strange indeed!

TH

 

I find Malwarebytes anti Malware 1.45 a bit of a bloatmonster compared to previous version...I can only run it on demand comfortably with other options turned off.
When I first used it a few versions ago it was crisp and clean..now it quite sluggish.
I run an older system with Windows 2000 and don't like bloaty suiteware type softwares. I'm not saying MBAM is bad but it is increasingly less useable for slightly older systems.

 

When MBAM finds something, that's when you get the chance to Ignore it. There is no place to build the list ahead ot time...

 

Yeah, as they add capabilites, it has grown.

SuperAntiSpyware had a similar problem a while back but they found a way to push the bulk of the RAM needs to the virtual memory. Under normal situations, the RAM level is usually under 1 MB now...

 

Well,what can i say......it sucks!...because all AV or AS programs have such thing.It's really odd that MBAM team overlook this very important feature.....

Triple Helix,it seems that we are the first that put this problem on the table

 

Really?

It's currently using 28MB of RAM on my system. Last version used over 40MB of RAM running in real time.

I find this version lighter than the last one by far.

 

MBAM 1.45 is currently running on my system
mbamservice=4,352K
mbam.exe=45,588K
It's not running in the tray
not sure what the megabytes conversion is?

 

Pretty much same for me.

 

it is around 50 megs of ram to run it

 

It's even lower for me

 

Damn...every system with its measures
I guess it has nothing to do with pc's RAM.

Updated.Here is the new measures.

 

mines mbamgui.exe 7308 and mbamservice.exe is 60,526.
Seems kinda high for me. Thats running in real time w/o the web shield.

 

Here's mine...

 

I noticed another oddness...when IDM starts a download,the mouse pointer is moving slow motion until the download finishes....if i exit MBAM,everything is ok.
Hmmm...i'm new to MBAM pro,but i already don't like it...and maybe quit for its real protection..

 

Joe do you have the web filtering on or off?

 

Not sure why it's so high on some of your system's. It is what I told you on mine. Showing processes from all users. The one thing that initially surprised me about the beta (which I was running), was that is was a lot lighter than the older version. The official release still runs the same as the beta for me. No where near as high as some of yours at all.

 

It's on.Is he the guilty one??

 

Might be. Turn it off and make sure you tick the start with windows off.

 

I turned mine off because it was slowing my opening browser.

 

Already did,and you are right.Web filtering was to blame,and yes,the browsing is faster now.
On the other hand,how useful is this feature?It's a must of some kind?

 

i just got an email for beta testing

~Private email removed per the TOS~