KAV 2009 & Threatfire

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Victek, Jun 25, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    Is anyone running TF together with KAV 2009? I've read that the Proactive Defense feature in KAV is similar to TF - should it be turned Off if TF is installed? Do you think TF would provide better protection then the Proactive feature in KAV? Your thoughts please - and thanks!
     
  2. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    I would say yes to only one behavior blocker should be used.I would apply the same rule as hips or AV and only use one.Which is stronger I cant say. Imo just use kaspersky cant see the point of a seperate program for behavior when kaspersky has it I think.
     
  3. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    I agree with the dog. Arf!*puppy*
     
  4. Lawliet

    Lawliet Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Posts:
    15
    I think just only KIS is enough.
     
  5. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    Yeah, Kaspersky's HIPS won't be worse than Threatfire.
     
  6. Someone

    Someone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    1,106
    Hi

    I thought ThreatFire's behavioural blocker was the best and Kaspersky's was relatively simple.
     
  7. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,675
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Not sure about that but TF is definitively a behavioural blocker whilst KIS's is more like classical HIPS with tweaks.

    Only one way to find out...try it!o_O
     
  8. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
  9. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    I found the video showing the ThreatFire test, but I didn't see one for KAV 2009. Did I miss it? In any case, TF stopped 7 out of 10 attacks. How does that compare with the others?
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2008
  10. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    I sent a PM to the maker of the video and the response was

     
  11. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    "I've just tested Kaspersky 2009 and it did a perfect 10 so will upload in a few days..."

    It's nice to know that KAV 2009 scored a ten, but unfortunately there's a lot we don't know. Specifically what malware was used in the test? Regarding Threatfire, were the samples it missed of a type it's designed to catch? Is it reasonable to compare a program like KAV 2009, which combines multiple AV&AS technologies to Threatfire which is primarily a behavior blocker meant to be used along with other AV and AS apps?
     
  12. ghodgson

    ghodgson Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Posts:
    835
    Location:
    UK
    I tried to install KAV on my PC with TF already installed and KAV wont install while TF is there.

    Gordon
     
  13. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Question is did he tested behave blocker of KAv or the HIPS or even the signarure based AV itself?

    Can you ask him?

    Thanks
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2008
  14. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,675
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Same if yo uhave Prevx CSI already installed. Simple solution; uninstall TF, install KAV and then reinstall TF...et voila!:D

    That's what I did with Prevx!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.