Is it just me or is 3.0.684 faster?

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by PRJUS, Dec 19, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Smacky, I honestly cant provide you with what you are asking. So I respect your need for solid criteria and I guess we will just have to leave it at that for now. You are right in asking but I know what I am seeing with Version 684. So I apologize with not answering your post in the informative manor you asked for.
     
  2. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    According to my scan logs a full scan isn't any faster. But the impression I have is one of web pages loading faster. 684 just has a different feel to it.
     
  3. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    In all honesty, it reminds me of running Geswall and nothing else. I do know my internet speeds are as fast as with Geswall, which up till now had the least impact on speed on my machines, if that helps. But here again, if I go to version 4, it all craps out in the beta. So that is why I said, Version 3 is now the product I had always hoped for. If I matched it up against Avira for web speed, it would be a toss up.
     
  4. stratoc

    stratoc Guest

  5. CivilTaz

    CivilTaz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Posts:
    146
  6. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
  7. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,286
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    I have done tests on my machine and it is faster. Not subjective- but objective tests. In addition, I had 100% CPU spikes with all but 2.7 and uninstalled Eset for that reason. This build is not only empirically faster for boot-up, file opening and closing, and on-demand scan speed, but also does not cause CPU spikes on my machine. That is not the placebo effect, but it also does not prove this build is faster on other user's machines. Obviously, I cannot provide data for them. But my educated guess is that it is at least somewhat faster.

    But it is faster on mine. :thumb:
     
  8. Bunkhouse Buck

    Bunkhouse Buck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Posts:
    1,286
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    Its real close, but after tests, Ver 3 is slightly faster than Avira overall and the fastest I have ever used on my computer. :thumb:
     
  9. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,618
    Defs definitely faster and more reliable. I'm happy with the new build.
    Good job, ESET :cool:
     
  10. PaulB2005

    PaulB2005 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Posts:
    525
    Well after having used 684 for a couple of days i started to think "hey, this seems a bit snappier." I came in to check the change log and found this thread had been started. I didn't read the thread and then think "hmmmm.. actually.."
     
  11. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    My boot up is definitely faster. Every morning I start my computer and go get a cup of coffee. By the time I return half my sys tray icons are up. After installing 3.0.684 all the icons are up when I return. You can't get better test results than that. :D
     
  12. elapsed

    elapsed Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Posts:
    7,076
    Maybe your coffee machine is taking longer?
     
  13. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    No, I always make 2 cups and it beeps when it's done.
     
  14. demoneye

    demoneye Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,356
    Location:
    ISRHell
    seems to be really more faster than previous version , and also from all AV i test in here.... very impressive :thumb:
     
  15. rolarocka

    rolarocka Guest

    omg no i wanna test it myself :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.