Hey give us straight answer

I went to find that thread about TDS3 doesn't detect Spector Pro 5 thread

seems to me like you dodgeing the topic and running around the subject bottom line do you or dont you detect Spector Pro 5 a simple yes or no will sulfice no deep explanation no blah blah just a yes or a no

if its no its because no ones submited it and i can understand that

so yes or no thx in advance

 

It's quite pathetic really. I remember reading one of the moderators giving us an excuse like "oh the companies could extort us if we were forced to buy the software!" or they send you to buy process guard. Hey this is a trojan of the worst kind and you guys dont cover it? THATS SHAMEFULL

I AM PAYING DAMN GOOD MONEY FOR THIS SOFTWARE AND I WANT TO BE PROTECTED! YOU HEAR ME I WANT MY MONIES WORTH!

How can they not protect us from trojans such as this... These are trojans of the worst kind and they are not covering us!

 

This is a quote from the thread below from one of the moderators: Phili

It does a whole lot more than simply catch trojans eh? Unless those trojans cost us a few bucks to buy so we can cover the thousands of customers we have but we wont purchase it because they may "extort" us

 

This thread will continue if and only if no more threats are made. The question has been asked by Blaze and we will now await a response.

 

Blaze, i think you got very straight answers in the other threads?
Send your copy to Gavin and he'll make sure it's detected if it wasn't already.
You've been told if you install a commercial software .... etc.
https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=47446&highlight=Spector Pro 5
https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=47782&highlight=Spector Pro 5

BTW: did you examen your TDS Primary list lately? Very much worth the trouble to answer your question.
Now try a next full system scan with your fully updated radius.
Have fun!

You're right: TDS is a shamefull good product for which you paid shamefull little money, even far less then for your shamefull commercial spector which btw is not the worst trojan ever, just a commercial keylogger.

 

UNhAPPY CUSTOMER AHHHHH HH why people turn my threads into things like that gasssp

i was being seriouse

this qustion was mainly for my small brain

i just wanted a yes or a no not a why

i know why payed malware trojans and comerchial spyware exsits

i know AT and AV companys dont cover comerchial trojans because it be like handing over millions of dollers to teorist of cyberspace duhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

every scripting mofo hacker slash scripter slash programer would be comeing out with comerchial malware and trojans and we have to give into there demands

but i just wanted a yes or a no damn

is that really to much

i wasnt going to get upset about it i just wanted to know for my owen type thing

plus tds is a good product so what if it dont capture what a lousey 15 comerchial trojans either the goverment uses or fortune 5000 companys use or your spouse wants to know if your cheating on them sounds more like a personal problem for them thinking you are.

bottom line i wouldnt give up my tds

plus the trojans i should wory about are the ones in the wild

not the ones some boss puts on my computer to see if im surfing porn on company time lol

but man was a yes or no to hard to follow

i got small brain ill go look at those threads but i think ill just end up with alot of hightechblahhhhhh lol brb

 

i am now more confused and wondering about avast and snoopfree are those good products?

were you trying to sales pitch me on something else cause it working lol

got my cureiosty going now lol

 

Hi Blazie, Here is a screenie of the TDS3 primary list

HTH Pilli

 

lol now that says it all thank you normaly i dont do this to guys but lol smoooooooooooochhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

Help Jooske!! .......

 

Blaze your answers are confusing i did answer your question very clear, gave older related discussion threads, told you to look in the primaries list of which Pilli even produced a clear screenshot, so what more do you want?
Think you should also hug Wayne for making TDS the nicest program and Gavin for adding detection what you asked for, so make it a hug party or something like that.
BTW: Hope babysitting that little belly dancer mouse is not too much of a burdon to you in that avatar? (i do like it!)

 

Thanks to Jooske for info and to Pilli, for that screenshot.

Frankly, I'm amazed (but gratified) that TDS-3 bothers with commercial keyloggers, as this seems to be an area which specialists like Spycop are muscling in on.

Well done to the DCS dudes, who, as I can tell from reading in these forums, don't ask for uncritical devotion ('twould be fruitless, anyway!), and who in my opinion, put a very creditable amount of effort into product development.

 

Wayne closed a earlier thread where this subject was discussed. The detection was added because someone who had bought the program had submitted the program to DCS.

After reading Wayne's answers and really taking a look at the malware scene, I came to the conclusion that there are much worse things out there than Spector.

If someone really wants into a computer, they are more likely going to do it with very hard to detect trojans and rootkits. I recently came across something on the internet that claimed to have found a way past Kaspersky real-time scanner. Here is what the website said:

"New Generation of Process Stopping and Frw Disabling for IT Secuirty Testing Purposes!
It supersedes kav real time monitor and discovers a vulnerability in there, because before
the realtime monitor prevents execution it is already executed and started disabling."

I found that on a blackhat site. If I had a choice, I would prefer DCS adding definitions for things like that and worse than I would having them wasting time trying to add commercial keyloggers to the definitions that are unlikely to be put on your computer unless you allow someone with physical access to log on to your computer as administrator

So to be safe from Spector it is simple by just making sure you you dont give people physical access to your computer with administration rights.

There are many anti-keylogger programs that do a better job if trying to find commercial keyloggers is a real concern.



Starrob

 

Detection and protection for far worse things are in the primaries.
And did you have a proper look at ProcessGuard already and try it? designed especially for what you described.
We've a whole interesting support forum for that!

 

I already have ProcessGuard. I already consider that more important than any scanner because all scanners can be beaten.



Starrob

 

Dear Derek,


Already done. See your private message.


Sincerely,



Starrob

 

I am rather mixed on the subject myself. It is very clear to see why trojans and rootkits should be concentrated more. But if you think about it, most anti trojan developers like DCS are very familiar with the people who write certain trojans, and when the trojan authors develop a new version, they are on it pretty quick. But I have also seen some instances where blackhats are simply encrypting and packing programs like radmin. And this makes sense if commercial remote access tools are not of a high priority for AT programs. And if dedicated anti keylogging programs can not deal with encrypted or packed versions of remote access tools. If these remote access tools are being used by blackhats in this way, it is no longer about someone with physical access and administrative rights, it poses just as large a threat as any other RAT.

Did you submit the file to KAV as well?
Would be interested to their reply if they send you one.

 

Hi rerun2, I hope that was a typo Anti Tojan is what I hope you meant

Cheers. Pilli

 

heh heh yes thank you, corrected

 

omg my post dissapered lol

will anyways hug smoochhhh all dcs team thx jooskey

 

I sent a pm to Igor on KAV board and he did not respond. They do most likely know about it and have fixed it, though. I know that the recently came out with a new build but they don't say anything about fixing that vulnerability in the new build but I am fairly sure they quietly added a definition for it.

I have read enough things on the internet to know that KAV real time monitor does have weaknesses. Yes, the real time monitor will stop almost everything that is out there BUT someone with the know how can design special things that can get by the real time monitor if they are specifically targeting KAV.

This is why I also use a Anti-Trojan in addition to TDS-3 that has a resident real time monitor. TDS-3 currently does not have a real-time resident monitor. The execution protection is not a real-time monitor. TDS-4 will more likely than not have a very advanced real-time monitor.


Starrob

 

ok that not funny where are my posts disapearing to i ythink i posted 3 times and when i come back they gone is this place hunted

 

Nobody knows what is in TDS-4. But remember there will be the ActiveGuard, the very advanced resident protection we all look forward to.