That is not the case as it would make Disconnect look bad. There is not third party download currently available.
We would begin by recognizing the software developer and software user as the first two parties. Lets go with a "the first-party is the producer & the second-party is the consumer" definition. Here, the Disconnect.Me app developers would be the first-party and the user would be the second-party. Google would be a third-party and thus an entity you would want to eliminate from the equation. Anyone developing security/privacy software should be cognizant of the "eliminate third parties" rule as well as the "no one size fits all rule". IOW, the Disconnect.Me developers would look bad if they didn't offer distribution and updating from their own servers.
The EFF Blogged this recently - some of you may find it an interesting read. Blocking Consumer Choice: Google's Dangerous Ban of Privacy and Security App https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/...ce-googles-dangerous-ban-privacy-security-app
Disconnect would look bad if they hosted a third party side-load but this is not the case as they (Disconnect) no longer host the app. Google is clearly the bad guy here as they want to monetize Play apps as much as possible without any fussy apps that could possibly protect your Privacy in the way. This will not be the last Privacy app booted from the Google Play Store.
Why would they look bad? They would be standing for privacy, and refusing to be censored. That's all good. Google would consider them "bad", but why does that matter? Maybe EFF or the Guardian Project ought to host privacy-friendly apps censored by Google or Apple. Yes, of course. No doubt Isn't it past time for a viable alternative?
Google is a company that is difficult to place trust in, imho. They are more than willing to take a public stand against NSA spying, even going so far as encrypting all of their services to thwart such activity. But when it comes to their own privacy issues, suddenly they don't feel so inclined to stand up for the "little people" anymore. It is very two-faced of them, and I miss the days before they saw data as a giant pile of money. I don't know what kind of alternative there could be, that people would be able to trust of course. Being an Android user myself, I'm quite surprised that Google has not yet removed the ability to install third-party applications.
I will never use an Android until there's a secure OS that firewalls baseband attacks. And indeed, I'll probably wait until someone creates a secure baseband radio.
I knew nothing and still know next to nothing about those kinds of attacks. I did a short search and came across a couple of links from 2011 that gave a very basic rundown. With all these fake cell towers that are evidently being found across the U.S now, I guess that sort of mischief is a reasonable concern. Shoot, a man can't hardly do anything anymore without his government or some other horses behind interfering or causing trouble
I only got into Android within the last few years, and only cause I had a phone (with service disabled) that a family member didn't want anymore cause they upgraded. Of all the mobile platforms (Mac/Windows) Android is the lesser of the evils, but it's very Google branded (obviously). Even with Cyanogenmod, there's quite a few Google services that still get installed by default, basically all of which I have little use for and wish I could remove just on the basis of it chewing up resources. But there are a handful of neat apps I do like: https://prism-break.org/en/categories/android/ Practically almost everything on the Google Play store is adware ridden garbage, much like you'd find with the "freeware" of the 90s and early 2000s. There is F Droid though as an alternative. I would encourage you to pick up a cheap device and play around with it though. Can always pop the battery out and throw it in a Faraday cage when you're done. But really, I'd just like to see someone with your know-how dabble with Android.
Are there Android platform limitations that negatively impact the updating of sideloaded of apps? Is it possible for a sideloaded app to be automatically updated (from a non Google server of course)? Assuming the app we're discussing isn't some cloud-query-based filtering engine, it would need to frequently download/update its filtering rules. Which would mean either updating the app in its entirely (if rules are inextricably linked to the package) or separately downloading just the filter rules (updates). I'm wondering if disparities between not-sideloaded and sideloaded are enough to require significant changes to and/or additions to the app itself. From what I've read, Android's updater is hard-coded to the Google Play store and thus sideloaded apps and developers would have no platform features to help carryout and standardize updating. Is that correct? Are there any [other] client-side issues that "discourage" developers from offering sideloaded versions?
Disconnect Mobile back on Google Play Read all required app permissions before installing. These should always be reviewed first. More info: http://www.cnet.com/news/privacy-guard-disconnect-mobile-returns-to-google-play/ Not an endorsement of product of any kind.
From the earlier blog post: From the CNet Article: Some reasons why people block ALL ads by default: 1) The mechanisms used to retrieve ads (especially personalized ads) can make you vulnerable to tracking. Including some forms of tracking that are obscured due to it being done server side. 2) There is often an active component (javascript, flash, ...) involved and that active component can be a threat (using APIs to gather info from the client, attempting to exploit vulnerabilities, generating secondary requests). 3) The ads themselves are usually configured to subject you to tracking if you interact with them. Clicking on an ad, even accidentally, can expose you to systems which use more sophisticated tracking and data sharing. The original Disconnect.Me conditional wording had me wondering if it would be a truly effective tool. Did they change something to further weaken it? I don't use Android so observations aren't possible. Perhaps if someone else does and takes a hard look at how things behave when the app is installed, they'll let us know.
Does not appear to be available at this time on Google Play, As of this post on Disconnect's Web site there is a download available from them directly. https://disconnect.me/mobile/disconnect-mobile
It would seem Disconnect have run afoul of Google Play yet again ! The download you point to requires installing from unknown sources effectively allowing a side-load. Stand by as Disconnect and Google duke it out.
Google should just go ahead and say they don't want these applications in their store, instead of trying to make it sound as if application developers are not following some convoluted agreement. I'm a simple sort of man, but I can see their game. They do this just about every time someone has come up with a permissions controlling application or a privacy type of application. My opinion on the matter is that I bought the darned device, I ought to have a say in who gets to see my data and who gets to send what to my device.
I get that. But why is that bad, in this case? Except for Google's issues, I mean. In my opinion, what's bad is the whole idea of a closed system with a gatekeeper.
See Google's Developer Agreement. https://play.google.com/about/developer-distribution-agreement.html Disconnect are pushing the envelope by posting a side-load alternate link other than via Google Play.
Sideload, unknown sources be darned, if it allows us users to take some control back I support it. You have got to be awful careful about applications and developers claiming to do this and that when you install things, but if they are reputable do what you have to do. I don't have any problems with having a gatekeeper, so long as they are watching out for my well being and are on my side. In this case though, it sure seems more like a warden than a gatekeeper.
I guess I'm not understanding the problem. If Disconnect is pushing its own product on its own website and not using the Play store, how in the world does the Play store agreement apply? Are you saying that because Disconnect is a trusted developer in the store that, simply by making their product available elsewhere they are infringing on that agreement? Heck, if that is the case I would never sign that agreement again and avoid the store for the rest of my days.