GesWall, BufferZone and SysWatch...which one?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by ichito, Feb 8, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,247
    How do you protect against infections from removable drives?
     
  2. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,247
    Could you be more specific regarding GW?
    Are you saying that GW is useless on Windows XP/Vista/7/8 because it protects against old type of malwares?
     
  3. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    A question about GeSWall, I'm currently looking into GeSWall and DefenseWall for a older system of a friend and an old system of mine and found this page:
    http://www.brighthub.com/computing/smb-security/articles/55807.aspx

    Which states about GeSWall:
    Does anyone have any detailed info about this, I read their individual reviews about GeSWall and Defensewall, but there is nothing about this in it.
     
  4. 1000db

    1000db Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Posts:
    718
    Location:
    Missouri
    When a file with an untrusted token was moved it could lose the untrusted status and then it became uncontained. Defensewall maintains untrusted status unless the user specifically trusts it on purpose.
     
  5. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    Yes, I read about that, but that is what they mean with "total untrusted file control", I mean what they are saying with "nor is it capable of defending from higher level of intrusions."
     
  6. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,247
    I already knew about this link you posted, but like you I'm also waiting for someone to explain this more thoroughly and if this is true or false, of course.
     
  7. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    3,351
    Location:
    Europe, UE citizen

    I wrote about it two years ago to the GW developers, and they answered to me that it's an intentional feature: if you move a file it means that you anyway already trusted it.
     
  8. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    Does anyone know how GeSWall handles dll injection? I read that with DefenseWall when an untrusted process injects a dll into a trusted process, that becomes untrusted as well, but I coudn't find any info on how GW handles this.
     
  9. Boost

    Boost Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Posts:
    1,294
    http://www.gentlesecurity.com/protectnetwork.html
     
  10. CoolWebSearch

    CoolWebSearch Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,247
    Based on this can GesWall free or pro actually replace inbound firewall (xp, windows7, vista, 32-bit)?
    Does it mean GesWall is actually more secure than Sandboxie, because SBIE cannot replace any firewall with inbound protection?
    Because as far as I know SBIE does not block this?
    But if it can be configured in SBIE than both SBIE and GesWall are equally secure?
     
  11. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    3,351
    Location:
    Europe, UE citizen
    The work of a sandboxing programs like GW or SB is not to replace the firewall, but to enhance the security with a new protection level. More, a sandboxing program is a protection against malwares that try to execute from web pages and other sources.
     
  12. ichito

    ichito Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Posts:
    1,997
    Location:
    Poland - Cracow
    One can set allowing "Resource Access Rule" for network but I think it's rather in/out rule and it's not possible make only out or only in rule...look at this screen
    -http://i.imgur.com/nil7Y.jpg?3924
     
  13. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.