G Data 2015 Beta

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by malexous, Dec 14, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 2 of 2
  1. safeguy

    safeguy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    Posts:
    1,795
    The AV industry really is evolving beyond my wildest dreams. I didn't expect a Time Machine. Or is this an Inception? When 2015 comes, we all would experience Deja Vu.
     
    safeguy, Dec 16, 2013
    #26
  2. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,102
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    not a gdata fan myself but i am testing it on one of my test machines. ill throw everything at it this week and see how it does. for me at least 2014 was a "fail" overall. besides it being so heavy on the system.

    i agree though the 2015 moniker is just really plain stupid.
     
    zfactor, Dec 16, 2013
    #27
  3. Inside Out

    Inside Out Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2013
    Posts:
    421
    Location:
    Pangea
    I didn't think anyone here would agree that 2014 has extremely poor detection. :thumb:
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2013
    Inside Out, Dec 16, 2013
    #28
  4. Taliscicero

    Taliscicero Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,439
    Says who? some random guy on the internet "you" who does nothing but bad mouth the product with out ever testing it?

    ( http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/home-user/windows-7/julaug-2013/ )

    AV-TEST.org

    GDATA 2014

    Protection against 0-day malware attacks, inclusive of web and e-mail threats (Real-World Testing)

    (JUL) 100% / (Industry average:91%) Samples used: (125)


    (AUG) 100% / (Industry average: 97%) Samples used: (19,581)

    (Protection Score 6.0/6.0)

    Go away, you bother me and you are a buffoon. ;)
     
    Taliscicero, Dec 16, 2013
    #29
  5. fax

    fax Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Posts:
    3,898
    Location:
    localhost
    :D .. The best would be to ignore the troll...
     
    fax, Dec 16, 2013
    #30
  6. larryb52

    larryb52 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Posts:
    1,131

    totally agree, its crazy to think they will be able to predict what technologies will actually be needed by than?
     
    larryb52, Dec 16, 2013
    #31
  7. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    As I have said before he is not bashing the right product here.

    Volvic, one of our members here, for example bad-mouthed Webroot for many posts before he was given a warning;

    So there must be different criteria used for Inside Out and GData? :p

    The quotes below from Inside Out seem very similar to the above criteria for at least a warning?


    So my suspicion that you only receive a warning for bashing only ESET/Webroot products may be correct after all? :blink:

    All we ask for is equal and fair treatments for all products.
     
    Blackcat, Dec 16, 2013
    #32
  8. fax

    fax Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Posts:
    3,898
    Location:
    localhost
    Yeap :thumb:
     
    fax, Dec 16, 2013
    #33
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...