Future Changes to Prevx

Discussion in 'Prevx Releases' started by Triple Helix, Jun 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PC__Gamer

    PC__Gamer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    526
    This statement is very inaccurate,

    prevx DOES have behaviour-based detections, ive been adding rather a few samples to Prevx over the past week due to these types of detections, as heuristics/cloud had failed with the detections.

    undetected zero day samples would execute for a few minutes/seconds etc and THEN prevx would alert me about the missed detection due to their behaviour.

    Prevx were one of the first to use the cloud, use these methods of detections many many years ago, and only NOW, some antivirus's are trying their products out with these.

    so the way i see it, Prevx has quite a few more years experience in these matters than all the rest. :)
     
  2. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    1,387
    This is interesting.
    But after minutes/seconds maybe it is too late , malware could already have done the harm.
    Maybe there is a kind of virtualization or sandbox?
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2010
  3. PC__Gamer

    PC__Gamer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    526
    No, some samples are not quick to activate and slow to get going, this is what I meant by minutes/seconds,

    Detection occurs on its behaviour, each sample is different, but prevx is very good as a behaviour blocker for undetected samples, I wouldn't worry too much about this,

    Like I said, prevx as had these technologys long before many others, they know what they are doing.

    What you won't see is prevx asking the customer to allow/deny everything as this isn't great.
     
  4. Habakuck

    Habakuck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    544
    Do you have a rough timetable for the release of version 4? :)

    Will it be this year oder next year? Or 2012?
     
  5. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Our goal is to get it out this year. We have a load of exciting technology coming behind it (and, as usual, we're being quite tight-lipped about it for now :)) so it will take some time to complete everything but we're looking to spread the testing of it further, possibly by adding in some of the functionality to Prevx 3.0 as well in the transition to 4.0.

    I'll keep everyone here updated as we make progress! :)
     
  6. rockdj99uk

    rockdj99uk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Posts:
    24
    Sounds exciting. I do hope it is as light on resources and quick to scan as the current version.
     
  7. Habakuck

    Habakuck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    544
    I think it will! :D
     
  8. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Our current plans have Prevx 4.0 coming in even smaller than 3.0 :D
     
  9. Habakuck

    Habakuck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    544
    Doublication
     
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2010
  10. rockdj99uk

    rockdj99uk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Posts:
    24
    Excellent. :)
     
  11. Habakuck

    Habakuck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    544
    I would like to see a "scan override" option so that i can define areas which PrevX do not scan at all!
     
  12. PC__Gamer

    PC__Gamer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    526
    advanced scan > custom scan.
     
  13. Habakuck

    Habakuck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    544
    No, i meant the on-execution scanner.

    There is a "detection override" function but the files are still scanned but not detected.

    But i want them not to be scanned!
     
  14. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Understood :) This is a reasonable request and I'll see what we can do to get it in place without slowing down the operation of the scanner!
     
  15. Habakuck

    Habakuck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Posts:
    544
    Very good! :thumb:
     
  16. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    +1.

    Easy off/on is needed (by me, at least) because I only use SOL when doing serious schtuff.
     
  17. pling_man

    pling_man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    Posts:
    599
    Location:
    UK
    Right click menu in system tray contains "Stop protection". But this is called "Suspend protection" in main GUI. Change both to "Suspend protection". Use stop protection on the next screen that appears (as now in the main GUI).
     
  18. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,872
    Location:
    Outer space
    When you click the SafeOnline icon and click configure, it automatically adds the current site to max protection, please remove this, if I click configure I want to configure, not add a site, there is already a add protection button for that.

    keep up the good work with this great product :)
     
  19. Gasp

    Gasp Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Posts:
    82
    Would it be a good idea to implement a backup scanner, say Ikarus. Double Protection for online and offline :)
     
  20. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    it will defenitly very good idea to have active process activities within prevx:thumb: and be able to take control in case of bypass and more control to the pc's activities:thumb:
     
  21. papillonn

    papillonn Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Posts:
    117
    Location:
    TR
    Could you please support comodo dragon browser?
     
  22. PC__Gamer

    PC__Gamer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    526
    Very much doubt this would happen, the four major browsers will be the ones supported and if, if they were to add another, it would probably be safari
     
  23. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    No I don't want some bloated piece of software! If you want something like that just add a free AV such as Avast or AVG!

    TH
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2010
  24. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Yes indeed since Prevx is currently developing a Mac version so I don't see why they wouldn't since Safari is the standard web-browser in Mac OS X :D
     
  25. PC__Gamer

    PC__Gamer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    526
    hell no!

    I will ditch prevx the day they start to use multiple engines, :rolleyes:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.