Di I need ProcessGuard if I have System Saftey Monitor (Full Version)

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by ChrisP, May 20, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ChrisP

    ChrisP Suspended Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Posts:
    447
    Location:
    UK
    Hi, is there any point having both? Yes, No, if so why etc.

    Cheers,
     
  2. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    no; SSM covers the same things as PG and more.
     
  3. EASTER.2010

    EASTER.2010 Guest

    AFAIK System Safety Monitor (Full), easily blows away apps like those anymore. The best part of SSM for me is that it is as stable as iron with no taxing the system whatsoever. They done a great work with this app. Coverage is formidable and they've obviously mapped out most all the critical areas of potential entry to your system, and those the haven't? You can add to the program for coverage. One of many other favorite features of mine is "Keep This Process In Memory" which will restart any security app if it happens to undergo an attack to terminate it.
    LoL
     
  4. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    No, excessive overlap. Of the two, go with SSM.

    Blue
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.