Deep Freeze VS Returnil

Discussion in 'sandboxing & virtualization' started by searaider, Aug 9, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. searaider

    searaider Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Posts:
    61
    I believe both programs are almost identical, can the users who have tried them tell me if i am wrong or write, and wich is better or you, thanks
     
  2. tradetime

    tradetime Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Posts:
    1,000
    Location:
    UK
    Hi Searaider, you may get more meaningful response if you specify better for what, or in what regard. To the best of my knowledge both are solid capable applications, deepfreeze by reputation (I haven't used it) and rvs by both reputation and personal experience. If you list what performance you require from the software then likely people may be able to tell you which one most closely fits your needs. As MikeNas has added, shadow defender is another seems to have a good reputation.
     
  3. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    Both are very good. Just consider that Returnil has a free version.
     
  4. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Removed one post from this thread. This thread is about Deep Freeze v Returnil, and not a place to list all your other favorites.

    Pete
     
  5. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Another factor in comparing them is Coldmoon is here on this forum, and if you have problems/questions you will likely get a faster response from him on returnil.

    Pete
     
  6. ambient_88

    ambient_88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    854
    I would say Returnil is better. AFAIK, you can't save sessions in Deep Freeze while you can in Returnil (premium version, but it's cheaper than DF). There is also a free version of Returnil.
     
  7. SystemJunkie

    SystemJunkie Resident Conspiracy Theorist

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Posts:
    1,500
    Location:
    Germany
    Agree.
     
  8. farmerlee

    farmerlee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,585
    Returnil is a lot more convenient to use for the average user plus it has a free version. You can turn it on when you want and save your session if you want. Deepfreeze on the other hand requires rebooting the pc whenever changing between enabled and disabled plus there is no option to save the session when enabled.
    Personally i use deepfreeze because at the time i bought it returnil was still in its early days and wasn't a mature product.
     
  9. searaider

    searaider Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Posts:
    61
    And issues between returnil and windows vista, any?
     
  10. ambient_88

    ambient_88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    854
    None that I know of. It's pretty stable.
     
  11. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    I believe that Deep Freeze does not protect the MBR or the partition table outside of Windows, but I believe that Returnil does. Not positive about this but someone around here should know this for sure.

    Acadia
     
  12. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Correct.
     
  13. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    I believe you can save session with deepfreeze with the mapping tool but never used it or understand it.Deepfreeze installs in a frozen state from the go and to opt out I think it was the shift ctrl F6 or option of ctrl and double click tray icon to bring up the window to select when the user wants to unfreeze followed by reboot.multiple steps before reboot.Also note deep freeze installs very different it does not show the program in all prog or add and remove.to unistall the program if I remember correct same as above.Retunil installs like just about any other program with uninstaller in All programs and the add and remove.Retunil allows session lock/on the fly protection off on next reboot.Retunil allows full time protection until user turns off followed by reboot.That said unless deep freeze protects the MBR retunil seems a safer choice and simplicity.Also the choices of free or paid is sweet.
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2008
  14. Coldmoon

    Coldmoon Returnil Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Posts:
    2,981
    Location:
    USA
    Hello searaider,
    There are two issues at the moment we are working to address:

    1) In the 2.0 version release, RVS and Vista hibernation are not compatible. The work around at the moment is to disable hibernation and use sleep instead. We have added a correction in the 2.01 Beta to address this...

    2) 2.01 and below are not x64 compatible. We are working to obtain Microsoft certification as quickly as possible.

    Mike
     
  15. glentrino2duo

    glentrino2duo Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Posts:
    310
    Second reason I use Returnil. Just see the post before this one. Thanks Coldmoon!

    First reason? It's simply a great piece of security app! :)
     
  16. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,618
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    I've used both, and decided for DeepFreeze. The rule to test applications for the full trial period is IMO the only way to see what happens in your very specific environment.

    Returnil has undoubtedly more to offer than DeepFreeze, starting a virtual session without rebooting and offering a free version for private use, are great offerings. It also seems to protect against some low levels attacks where other similar applications fail. We are talking about extremely specialized malware that is normally detected by good AVs or blocked by HIPS (I'd like to add that running Vista, I am almost certain that UAC alone wouldn't allow this malware to run, hypothetical statement!).

    Why didn't I keep Returnil premium? For the very reasons Cold Moon mentioned, there seems to be a hard conflict with Vista's hibernation function, at the time nobody knew anything about it (4 months ago), and psychologically when one has a bad experience trialling an application the result is that you want to get rid of it as quickly as possible.

    What I like about DeepFreeze is its simplicity, speed , and lightness. You never feel it's there, quite robust and stable. Even reboots are the fastest I've experienced compared to others. I have ShadowUser on my XP laptop which has the great extra feature of saving virtual sessions on reboots, I have never used it in 3 years.

    Last but not least I should mention support: I don't know which is better between the omnipresent Coldmoon for Returnil and the excellent support from Faronics for DeepFreeze. When I wrote to Faronics support that AntiExecutable (also from Faronics) wouldn't install on my Vista laptop, they offered instantly to pay the cost for mailing them an image of my system so that they could investigate the causes. I declined at the time as I was not interested in an application that had such a negative impact on my system.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.