CryptoSuite OLD Benchmark Results

Discussion in 'Other Ghost Security Software' started by Jason_R0, Dec 1, 2003.

Page 2 of 7
  1. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    System Specs in Sig.....

    Regards,
    Kent
     

    Attached Files:

    • CSBM.jpg
      CSBM.jpg
      File size:
      17.5 KB
      Views:
      3,003
    puff-m-d, Dec 2, 2003
    #26
  2. Pilli

    Pilli Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    6,217
    Location:
    Hampshire UK
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Looks like Joop will have to tweak his timings - Ouch! :D

    Some system puff-m-d :D
     
    Pilli, Dec 2, 2003
    #27
  3. Joop

    Joop Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2002
    Posts:
    8
    Location:
    Holland ( near Arnhem )
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    :eek:

    Just have to get my hamer, torch and chisel....

    but yes................ ouch :eek:
     
    Joop, Dec 2, 2003
    #28
  4. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Hey...

    It was only 78 Cryptomarks!!!!

    Only 46 ms total time difference!!!!

    Regards,
    Kent
     
    puff-m-d, Dec 2, 2003
    #29
  5. gkweb

    gkweb Expert Firewall Tester

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Posts:
    1,932
    Location:
    FRANCE, Rouen (76)
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    AMD AthlonXP 2000+

    CPU Frequency: 1666MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 511MB
    Total time taken: 22415ms
    Average time for each test: 3202ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 22306 CRYPTOMARKS!

    i have a better score than the other AthlonXP 2000+ of this thread
    :cool:
     
    gkweb, Dec 2, 2003
    #30
  6. rerun2

    rerun2 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2003
    Posts:
    338
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Are the scores affected by HT or having dual CPUs?
     
    rerun2, Dec 2, 2003
    #31
  7. gkweb

    gkweb Expert Firewall Tester

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Posts:
    1,932
    Location:
    FRANCE, Rouen (76)
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    i think it should.
     
    gkweb, Dec 2, 2003
    #32
  8. Detox

    Detox Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    8,507
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Yeah you do, and with half my RAM :eek:

    Now I'm mad :D


    ooooh wait I just remembered I had TS and ICQ running last time.. tried again and seems like that's most of the difference. My extra RAM just doesn't help in this app.

    CPU Frequency: 1674MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 1023MB
    Total time taken: 22414ms
    Average time for each test: 3202ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 22307 CRYPTOMARKS!
     
    Detox, Dec 2, 2003
    #33
  9. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Having DUAL-CPU's and HT would help somewhat.. but not directly in CryptoSuite's benchmark. Most cryptographic algorithms aren't exactly designed to be split up amongst different threads. However, having another CPU also means that all the Windows threads and other process threads (when they are idle), which eat up roughly 2-10% of a single CPU won't affect your score like a single CPU. So I would say dual-cpu (and possibly HT) would have 2-10% better scores than single cpu people.

    Anyhow, here is my home-system benchmark. My system is an Athlon-3200+ on a NFORCE2 motherboard with 512MB of PC3200 ram. I only had 2 programs running (besides all the normal services, etc) whilst doing this benchmark. It would be great to compare an Intel P4 3.2ghz (which with AMD's rating is equal to my CPU) to see how close they are.



    -Jason-
     

    Attached Files:

    Jason_R0, Dec 2, 2003
    #34
  10. Gavin - DiamondCS

    Gavin - DiamondCS Former DCS Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2002
    Posts:
    2,080
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    I would bet on memory quality ;)

    Or maybe Joop moved his mouse :D :D
     
    Gavin - DiamondCS, Dec 3, 2003
    #35
  11. Pilli

    Pilli Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    6,217
    Location:
    Hampshire UK
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Can't wait to see the first Opteron results :cool:
     
    Pilli, Dec 3, 2003
    #36
  12. Jooske

    Jooske Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Posts:
    9,713
    Location:
    Netherlands, EU near the sea
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    You guys are not going to believe this, but it is really possible!
    A very old P166, winME on it, and ...... look for yourself i have CS running on it without any problem.
    CPU Frequency: 167MHz (=/- 5mhz0
    RAM Installed: 39MB
    Total time taken: 448972ms
    Average time for each test: 64138ms
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 1113 CRYPTOMARKS!
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    I admit is is an old test system only so only a few programs were running on it at the time, it's just that other people with less fancy systems then you toppers dare to post their less fancy scores too!
    It's not the system i work on though.
    And now you know it even runs without a problem on these specs. So add your family on the old PC-private projects systems and chat away!
     
    Jooske, Dec 3, 2003
    #37
  13. snapdragin

    snapdragin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Southern Ont., Canada
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    With as much turned off as i could (except services and a few necessary programs, my cryptomarks were higher...yeaaaa lol

    -----------------[Benchmark finished]----------------
    CPU Frequency: 1595MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 511MB
    Total time taken: 43087ms
    Average time for each test: 6155ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 11604 CRYPTOMARKS!


    But then with the programs that i normally have running, turned back on, i lost a few cyrptomarks there.

    -----------------[Benchmark finished]---------------
    CPU Frequency: 1595MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 511MB
    Total time taken: 44035ms
    Average time for each test: 6290ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 11354 CRYPTOMARKS!

    That doesn't look too bad. i don't know. LOL
     
    snapdragin, Dec 3, 2003
    #38
  14. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Ok, I think I will keep the TOP most post in this thread to contain the highest and lowest scores so far. When someone posts a lower/higher score then I will update them. :)

    Jooske, it is good to see see results from old machines like that. If I still had a 486 I would test that too. :)

    -Jason-
     
    Jason_R0, Dec 3, 2003
    #39
  15. Jooske

    Jooske Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Posts:
    9,713
    Location:
    Netherlands, EU near the sea
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Ok ok, put an old 486 together with 24 mb RAM and win98se on it for you. Hope to be able to post the benchmark results before tomorrow as this is really too hard for this combination. :)
    Suppose it will give -00X cryptomarks.

    could open of course only one CS instance and thus i could not try the chat with myself, not other functions bigger then just a very small file encryption, nice to try out such a thing.
     
    Jooske, Dec 3, 2003
    #40
  16. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    On a 486-50MHz (DX2) /24MB RAM it crashed when trying to get the CPU Speed (I guess the 486 does not support the instruction I use :) ) but I managed to add up the scores and calculate it anyhow.

    Total Time Taken: 1469510ms (1468 seconds)
    Average Time For Each Test: 209930ms (209 seconds)
    Your computer scored: 340 CRYPTOMARKS!

    So I guess the benchmark will probably only work on Pentium+ machines. CryptoSuite however seems to work fine on a 486 with only 24MB of ram. A little slow but it still works. ;)

    -Jason-
     
    Jason_R0, Dec 3, 2003
    #41
  17. Jooske

    Jooske Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2002
    Posts:
    9,713
    Location:
    Netherlands, EU near the sea
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    True, it comes through the benchmark tests, but crashes the program on the calculation for cryptomarks. Mine was a 66mhz SX if i remember well.
    Did not test the encryption nor chat in action, i think you could make a coffee waiting for a reply with so little RAM.
     
    Jooske, Dec 4, 2003
    #42
  18. SimonP

    SimonP Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Posts:
    2
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Looks like I am the new record holder :D
    I have a cheap Celeron 2.6 ghz, a little bit overclocked.

    /Simon
     

    Attached Files:

    SimonP, Dec 4, 2003
    #43
  19. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Wow congrats. What sort of cooling do you have on that? :)

    So I guess a 3.2ghz does beat an AMD 3200+.. just :)

    -Jason-
     
    Jason_R0, Dec 4, 2003
    #44
  20. SimonP

    SimonP Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Posts:
    2
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Thanks!

    I have no special cooling, it's original.
     
    SimonP, Dec 4, 2003
    #45
  21. Pilli

    Pilli Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    6,217
    Location:
    Hampshire UK
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    IMHO The CM's should be catagorised. Such as

    Laptop
    Intel - Normal
    Intel - Overclocked
    AMD - Normal
    AMD - Overclocked
    Special - Other CPU's & or specialised rigs.

    Slowest.
     
    Pilli, Dec 5, 2003
    #46
  22. Bob_Anderson

    Bob_Anderson Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    4
    Location:
    Ottawa, Canada
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    AMD 2100+ (1.733 Ghz), KT333 chipset, 512 MB 266 Mhz DDR RAM, XP Pro: 23,345

    Toshiba Tecra notebook, Pentium M 1.4 Ghz Centrino, Intel Odem 855PM chipset, 512 MB 266 Mhz DDR RAM, XP Pro: 19,879

    -Bob
     
    Bob_Anderson, Dec 5, 2003
    #47
  23. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    My system is a 3.0ghz with HT, and 1gig of high speed memory.

    Jason this would be an interesting comparison with your machine. By itself, I don't think the HT makes much of a difference. I did watch it run, and the benchmark, basically ran almost entirely on one processor. (HT shows up as 2 processors.

    1st test was just the benchmark, with nothing else.

    --------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
    CPU Frequency: 3028MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 1023MB
    Total time taken: 17013ms
    Average time for each test: 2430ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 29389 CRYPTOMARKS!
    ------------------------------------------------

    Then I open the DVD Player program, but didn't have it doing anything, and reran the benchmark.

    --------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
    CPU Frequency: 3028MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 1023MB
    Total time taken: 16832ms
    Average time for each test: 2404ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 29705 CRYPTOMARKS!
    ------------------------------------------------

    These results were within the margin of error. If I ran it 5 times, I would get different results within this range.

    3rd Test. Ran Benchmark with a move playing. This is the one I'd like Jason to try.

    --------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
    CPU Frequency: 3028MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 1023MB
    Total time taken: 19654ms
    Average time for each test: 2807ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 25440 CRYPTOMARKS!
    ------------------------------------------------

    Watching them run in the performance monitor, the movie was in one thread, and the benchmark in the other.

    Jason, I'd love to know your benchmark, with a move running in your DVD, if you have one. This could test the value of Intel HT.

    Pete
     
    Peter2150, Dec 5, 2003
    #48
  24. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    Well I havn't tested DVD playback on my main machine (the one which scored 30000). I have tested with other things happening in the background, compiling, webpages, etc. The lowest I have seen my machine get is ~25000 CryptoMarks. The CryptoSuite benchmark thread has a higher than normal priority, hence it will usually take all the CPU it can grab.


    -Jason-
     
    Jason_R0, Dec 5, 2003
    #49
  25. chev_rules

    chev_rules Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Posts:
    7
    Re:CryptoSuite Benchmark Results

    here is my benchmark scores for my Athlon 64bit running at 2.0Ghz with 1.0Gb of Mushkin high performance black level 2 ram

    --------------[Benchmark finished]--------------
    CPU Frequency: 2002MHz (+/- 5mhz)
    RAM Installed: 1022MB
    Total time taken: 16642ms
    Average time for each test: 2377ms
    ------------------------------------------------
    Your computer scored: 30044 CRYPTOMARKS!
    ------------------------------------------------
     

    Attached Files:

    chev_rules, Dec 23, 2003
    #50
Page 2 of 7
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...