CryptoSuite Benchmark Public Beta

Discussion in 'Other Ghost Security Software' started by Jason_R0, Sep 12, 2004.

  1. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    this is the very best I could do

    I have a prescott 3.4 stocked at 3400mhz and I have it overclocked this time at 3845 running smooth (never new that btw)
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    this time I overclocked to 3915 and if I add some mhz it needs to reboot so I know I have to quit now :D :D

    I am impressed btw (I have in fact a theoretical 3850MHZ)

    yieehaaa
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Bowserman

    Bowserman Infrequent Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Posts:
    510
    Location:
    South Australia
    Excellent scores ReGen and INFINITY :). I wonder what you would score in Super Pi at stock and then overclocked INFINITY.....with the 1MB test. The lowest I can get is 40secs here.

    @ Jason - Maybe you could make it so the user can define the amount of times each specific test is run and then calculate the average for that. Oh....and don't forget to add Hyper Threading support :D.


    Best regards,
    Jade.
     
  4. Bowserman

    Bowserman Infrequent Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Posts:
    510
    Location:
    South Australia
  5. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
  6. Bowserman

    Bowserman Infrequent Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Posts:
    510
    Location:
    South Australia
    It was a joke :rolleyes: ......back on topic.

    The most I can get at stock is 18249 here. Much better than my old 8000+ scores with a P4 1.6 :).

    Regards,
    Jade.
     
  7. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    It was pretty funny - I was going to post some pics like it here for all to enjoy.
    If I manage to push my bench over 14863 I'll re-post. Heavy duty benchmark. In most my system eats prescotts, but not this one. I wonder if Jason is going to release it as a standalone app?
     
  8. gkweb

    gkweb Expert Firewall Tester

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Posts:
    1,932
    Location:
    FRANCE, Rouen (76)
    new comp here, new results :) (not overclocked)
     

    Attached Files:

  9. Bowserman

    Bowserman Infrequent Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Posts:
    510
    Location:
    South Australia
    Nice score GK :D.....bet you're going to have a lot of fun with your new computer mate.

    Regards,
    Jade.
     
  10. Billy Blaze

    Billy Blaze Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Posts:
    79
    Location:
    Vorticon VI
    I knew I should have overclocked :(
     

    Attached Files:

    • 300.jpg
      300.jpg
      File size:
      17.1 KB
      Views:
      314
  11. Billy Blaze

    Billy Blaze Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Posts:
    79
    Location:
    Vorticon VI
    AMD seems to do a lot better than Intel in synthetics.

    Can someone donate an AMD64 FX-55 Clawhammer to test? :)
     
  12. DougRees

    DougRees Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2003
    Posts:
    41
    AMD 3500+ (Winchester) overclocked to 2.4GHz.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    Nice score Doug, standard you have a better score then me: but I just received new memory, time to play again I see :)

    take care
     
  14. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    The AMD 64 E revision CPU's will be out shortly, apparently you can overclock them to 2.8GHz and beyond on standard air cooling. Would make a good benchmark test. :)
     
  15. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    The last two years AMD has made some tremendous steps forward regarding heating and power :) I have seen Intels eaten by AMD like 150 times now... It's quite amazing imho

    My next computer would definately be an amd :) definately ;)
     
  16. Billy Blaze

    Billy Blaze Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Posts:
    79
    Location:
    Vorticon VI
    Not bad for a CPU with no L2 cache :D

    Intel Pentium M 2.0GHz Dothan
    2MB L2 cache
     

    Attached Files:

  17. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    Dothans / Pentium M are considered the best cpu's made by Intel (pentium three was awesome too imo) but it is still amazing Intel's scores on the Floating Points test...:D there lies the main difference with AMD I guess, not only graphical wise I'm affraid. the new venice will be impressive...
     
  18. Billy Blaze

    Billy Blaze Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Posts:
    79
    Location:
    Vorticon VI
    My integer and FPU scores are good for Intel but nothing compared to AMD. I think my poor hashing and encryption score is due to my aging 855 chipset which supports 400MHz FSB by default. I read that my board can support a 533MHz FSB but after lowering the mulitplier to 16x, I did not find an option to raise my FSB to 533MHz.
    TechSupport was of no help either. :doubt:

    On the plus, what really excites me about this setup is that temps have remained quite cool. Mid-low 20°C idle and low 30°C under load. The CPU fan is incredibly tiny as well. Even my case temps run a few degrees higher than CPU temps.

    But will wait to see how it will do when it gets really hot in summer.
     
  19. nick s

    nick s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Posts:
    1,430
    Now running a Gigabyte K8N Ultra-SLI with an Athlon64 FX55 2.6Ghz processor. No overclocking scores 21924.

    Nick
     

    Attached Files:

  20. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    I am impressed Nick!!!The processor you are mentioning is the top of the bill ;) and I think you can be sleeping on both ears for a long time with this one ;) wonder what your memory bandwidth is? Incredible FPU results and I bet that is the reason why amd is kickin Intel's a$$ :D

    Andy
     
  21. nick s

    nick s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Posts:
    1,430
    Hi Andy,

    It does rock ;). I have a lot to learn when it comes to hardware and overclocking. FWIW, I ran across ScienceMark and used it to measure my bandwidth at 2.737 Ghz.

    Nick
     

    Attached Files:

  22. nick s

    nick s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Posts:
    1,430
    When I pushed it just a little more to 2.747, I got this strange result. So now I am not sure how valid the previous score is.

    Nick
     

    Attached Files:

  23. Jason_R0

    Jason_R0 Developer

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Posts:
    1,038
    Location:
    Australia
    I think for some reason your overclocked system has produced an error in the encryption code and made it quit sooner than it should have for some reason. When your CPU is overclocked it can produce errors in the code which usually lead to crashes or unpredictable results.

    Go here and run Prime95 to see if there is any errors when running at that speed.
    http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm

    Ideally the benchmark should be saying that the encrypted/decrypted code didn't work by checksumming, I will have to check this beause it should be doing it already. :)
     
  24. Infinity

    Infinity Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    2,651
    With my San Diego 3700+ en GSKILL 2.5-3-3-7 .

    2750 (250*11) was possible and anything higher was a bsod.

    Heat is my biggest problem, cause those gskills can go to 275*11 under the right conditions (water cooling or dry ice-vapo) :cool:
     

    Attached Files:

  25. z.k.

    z.k. Guest

    Which CPU is better for encryption (especially for AES algorithm) Athlon64 3000+ or P4 3.00?
    Thanks.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.