Contradiction: new PCU OK or not???

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by Melkor, Dec 9, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Melkor

    Melkor Guest

    Clarify : does this mean that
    1) The 2.000.8 PCU was flawed because missing some files, and the special update fixes the PCU

    or INSTEAD:
    2) The 2.000.8 was flawed AND STILL IS, and the special update is not a fix, but a replacement(/i] of the 2.000.8 PCU?

    There seems to be a contradiction here, for on one hand they say that the special update "patches" the new PCU (like making it a "final" 2.000.8 PCU, inc. the missing files), but on the other hand they say they PULLED OUT THE 2.000.8 PCU! So which is correct?

    Has the 2.000.8 PCU been fixed by the update (thus is the new PCU still valid) or is the 2.000.8 PCU no longer valid, and the new update just removes all traces of it? o_O o_O
     
    Melkor, Dec 9, 2003
    #1
  2. MegaHertz

    MegaHertz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Posts:
    69
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    The way I read jan's post I believe that the original 2.000.8 PCU has been pulled completely and the current update just includes the files that were missing from the original PCU. If you did not DL the update yesterday then there is nothing for you DL at the present time. If you did DL it then today's update merely completes what you DL'd yesterday.
     
    MegaHertz, Dec 9, 2003
    #2
  3. Melkor

    Melkor Guest

    Yes, but then again U say that today's special update completes the 2.000.8 version, which implies that the 2.000.8 PCU IS necessary, thus contradicting the fact that this 2.000.8 PCU will, on the other hand, be removed from the site !?! o_O
     
    Melkor, Dec 9, 2003
    #3
  4. hayc59

    hayc59 Guest

    hmmm?? you have me confused now!! ;)
     
    hayc59, Dec 9, 2003
    #4
  5. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    18,280
    Location:
    New England
    The way I read the annoucement, this is true. Today's update provides the missing module(s) that would have allowed yesterday's update to work without a problem.

    It was removed "temporarily". Read the rest of what Jan said...

    That update will be reposted in a couple days.
     
    LowWaterMark, Dec 9, 2003
    #5
  6. Melkor

    Melkor Guest

    hehe - what d'you know - I read Jan's post somewhat hastily, I guess - saw 'offline' instead of 'online'.

    What a waste of a thread.
    *embarassment way beyond what the 'embarrased' icon could express*
     
    Melkor, Dec 9, 2003
    #6
  7. Melkor

    Melkor Guest

    BTW, when will the full (and fixed) 2.000.8 version be available for download?
     
    Melkor, Dec 9, 2003
    #7
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...