CCleaner 4.18.4844

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by stapp, Sep 26, 2014.

  1. niki

    niki Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Posts:
    365
    Slim is available: https://www.piriform.com/ccleaner/builds

    I deleted the standard version and installed the slim one. Unchecked both enable system monitoring and enable active monitoring. Works fine.

    Checked the icons in the Show hidden icons and see in the pic what I found. Now I am wondering of what is shown in the pic is an error or what?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    97,905
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    1. Using Process Explorer, when opening the CCleaner program, I see this:

    2014-09-29_102538.png

    2. Enabling Active Monitoring (which also enables System Monitoring), closing the CCleaner program via red x, with tray icon displayed, I see:

    2014-09-29_102658.png

    3. Opening CCleaner, and disabling System Monitoring first, then Active Monitoring, this prompt appears:

    2014-09-29_103031.png

    4. Closing CCleaner program (after disabling everything, and tray icon gone) shows no sign of previous process running.

    5. Now, I repeat step 2, while using Process Monitor, I see this repeatedly:

    2014-09-29_104001.png

    6. Performing step 4 again, shows no sign of any processes running in Process Monitor.
     
  3. ChristineBCW

    ChristineBCW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Posts:
    38
    Thanks, JR. Perfect.

    That first entry may be a log-file creation and holding open via ownership, and then the second entry may be the actual process logging to that opened-file.

    None of these are large, but I still don't like walking on my lawn and stepping on a little dog's poo anymore than a big dog's. "Why are ANY of these in MY system?!!"
     
  4. JohnBurns

    JohnBurns Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Posts:
    778
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    I for one, am done with CCleaner. The new version(s) have crashed by System twice. Really sad about it, but I can't continue with the hassle of having it screw up my pc.
     
  5. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Ah I understand, I thought you went straight to 4844 and had skipped to install 4842 ;) Thanks for the info JR
    Thanks for your info :)
     
  6. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    24,076
    Location:
    UK
  7. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    97,905
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Thanks stapp! :thumb:
     
  8. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,240
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
  9. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
  10. ChristineBCW

    ChristineBCW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2014
    Posts:
    38
    These threads are what Forums are great for. I will be setting up one computer with this 4844 version, whereas I've got so many at 4.14s and .16s. "The updates don't address any issue that's useful, so why bother?" has been a good excuse, and since 4.17's Bundleware Combat, it's been easy to ignore the product's so-called "advances". But Forums allow us to give and take, ask and get answers. Thanks, all.
     
  11. wolfrun

    wolfrun Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Posts:
    702
    Location:
    North America
    Is there any real advantage to update to 4.18.4844 other than the "active monitoring" which to me is not an advantage. So far have been sticking with 4.17.4808 slim version which has been working fine here.
     
  12. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    I'd say no.
     
  13. alicez

    alicez Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2014
    Posts:
    2
    I've always downloaded Slim version for my WinXP. Today I tried to download the 418 CC and I didn't see any Slim version listed. Isn't 418 Slim issued any longer for WinXP?
     
  14. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    97,905
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  15. alicez

    alicez Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2014
    Posts:
    2
    I don't know why when I click on the "check for updates" in the lower right of CCleaner (on the WinXP) it takes me to CCleaner (https://www.piriform.com/ccleaner/builds) page that only lists Portable and Installer, no Slim.
    Maybe it has something to do with IE8 that I have on the WinXP. But, as I said, this never happened previously.
    I did manage to download the Slim 418 and will just have to see how it behaves,.
     
  16. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,617
    Is this build completely borked ? I'm not to get a feeling ...
     
  17. Empath

    Empath Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2002
    Posts:
    178
    Follow-up versions removed it from Advanced, and made a "Monitoring" category in Options.
     
  18. Keatah

    Keatah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Posts:
    1,029
    CCleaner used to be pretty good. But recently it's become a little annoying and slightly buggy. Obvious things are being inexplicably overlooked. Hopefully they'll get it turned around.

    Additionally the forum staff is making fundamental errors in how questions are answered. To be fair, this is more a problem with Recuva than CCleaner.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.