Best Browser for Legacy PC

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by pvsurfer, Aug 21, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Which do you guys believe is the most 'resource-efficient' internet browser for a 'legacy' PC. It doesn't take much to bog-down my wife's PC - an early P3 with 256mb RAM (memory slots are full and I don't want to replace any hardware).

    So in that regard would Opera, Firefox (or whatever) be a better choice than IE (which is now on her PC)?
     
  2. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    either firefox or opera would be a better choice that IE in my opinion. as to how much less resources will be used I couldn't say exactly but it won't hurt to try them both, they will coexist just fine. They even get along with IE alright. :thumb:
     
  3. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    my first pick would be opera, but if u like firefox, keep very few extensions.
     
  4. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
  5. sosaiso

    sosaiso Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Posts:
    601
    I run Opera/FF on an OLD celeron with 256 RAM with no problems. FF uses about 30 mb of RAM, and Opera runs at about the same [maybe a little less].
     
  6. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks for the feedback. K-Meleon would seem to be the best fit for my wife's PC. If it doesn't work out (hopefully it's as user-friendly as IE), I'll next try Opera.
     
  7. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,618
    Location:
    USA
    Ok, I've installed K-Meleon on my wife's PC and it seems to be working much more responsively than IE6. :thumb:

    However, there are a few operational qwerks that I don't understand:

    1. It doesn't seem to recognize the site logon cookies used with IE.

    2. Right-clicking does not offer a 'Paste' function, so I need to teach my wife how to use Ctrl C & Ctrl V.

    3. The font-sizes on the Home page (with no change in screen resolution) is smaller than with IE6!

    There may also be additional operational peculiarities, that I have not yet encountered.
     
  8. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Why keep very few extensions? Do they contribute to heavy memory consumption or are extensions problamatic in other ways?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.