AV-Comparatives reports

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by IBK, Nov 30, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    downloaded :thumb:
    EDIT:
    Very good report
    You are anticipating a hard fight for the next year award :D
    VBA32 downgraded :eek:
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2006
  2. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Well I guess for some, if your choice wasnt the winner you would hear about how inaccurate tests like these are. But I know how much effort is put into these tests to make them as accurate and fair as possible so, Congrats to Eset and to you IBK, for all you do.

    Just wait till next year.:)
     
  3. DaveD

    DaveD Guest

    Summary 2006 report is available now. Great overview!
     
  4. dw2108

    dw2108 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Posts:
    480
    I was wondering, how would AntiVir 6 perform in these tests. AV 6 can still be updated with the fusebundle, the engine9x_h.zip and the specvir_h.zip. Many of the files in AV 7 with the same name, can be used with AV 6. Can anyone comment on AV 6 as per these tests?

    Dave
     
  5. FRug

    FRug Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    309
    The engines in those packages for AV6 are vastly different from the AV7 version. Detection would be a LOT worse with the AV6 engine. No "ahead" heuristics for example, and a lot of missing generic detections.

    Don't use v6, do yourself a favour.
     
  6. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Would this apply to Ashampoo AV as well, which seems to be using the 6.37 engine? o_O
     
  7. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    yes it would but i aint too sure about 7 being a whole lot better than 6.3 for detection
     
  8. FRug

    FRug Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    309
    I think ashampoo uses a v7 engine with old versioning number, if you have it installed you can easily tell by the size of avewin32.dll. If it is larger than 1,5mb it is a v7 engine with old version number.
     
  9. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    But why would they use an old version number? o_O
     
  10. FRug

    FRug Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    309
  11. btman

    btman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Posts:
    576
    IBK when the new comparatives test comes out could it be tested with the latest beta of Comodo and you could just make a post of its results? I'm curious to see if they've improved from the last test you did.
     
  12. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    Regarding Ashampoo antivirus.
    I thought it was the 6.37 AntiVir engine.Can't check it since I went to back AntiVir PE Classic after a few days.
     
  13. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    comodo will be included in the second testing group along with others, which results will be released most probably also in march.
     
  14. btman

    btman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Posts:
    576
    Awesome! Thanks for the quick reply.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.