AV-Comparatives: Real-World Protection Test - March 2016

BTW, I'm not a Kaspersky fanboy; not even a Kaspersky user.

Because, Kaspersky has traditionally outperformed eScan, Vipre, AVG, and ESET.
IF this happens in the next Tests, then, something wrong is going on with Kaspersky.

 

Microsoft traditionally WOULD outperform all participants when talking about the lowest FP rate and nobody remark that the opposite now. Did you see?.

 

Actually no, it just mean that other vendors improved and/or the samples favored them. 99,1 % is very respectable anyway, no reason to worry.

See this:

https://eugene.kaspersky.com/2011/10/18/the-holy-grail-of-av-testing-and-why-it-will-never-be-found/
https://eugene.kaspersky.com/2015/03/17/independent-av-testing-in-2014-interesting-results/

 

I saw it, but I focused on the 4.5% compromised...

Improved so much that they left Kaspersky behind.
Anyway, this was one test.
We will see how things go in the next tests...

 

No.