Av-Comparatives February '08

Quicken may be a FP without Avira.

 

bwahahahaahhaha. Good reply!

 

The Hammer:

The Hammer:

What i mean is that Avira found the most malware with the latest Retrospective test. and ...That is a fact.
It found an incredible number of samples more then the 2nd product.

Ok there were false positives, but every AV can have False Positives,
TrustPort Always put detected malware in quarantine, you can always restore FP's with one click, i guess the same with Avira

However the malware missed by others is a different problem.
Avira found a very large number of malware more then the 2nd in the test.

For example i prefer a product that find 30 thousand !! real threats MORE
then a product that has 3 False Positive less..
considering the fact that it takes 1 click to restore a False Positive
and it is almost impossible to remove unfound viruses and malware.

 

I feel the exact opposite. I want an AV with a LOW FP.

 

Then Mele, you have one with Avira.

 

I take everything that way keeps me out of trouble, of course if Norton was to write something I would just believe it

 

That's blind faith
I'll put more trust (see that I say "more trust" and not "total trust") in who doesn't get profits and presents convincing, reliable, provable arguments.