Antilogger Leak Test

i make this test for myself,
i know mamutu, threatfire, AVG identity protection are not antilogger
i know keyscrambler, nexgen antilogger havent got screenlogger, webcamlogger, .. protection

 

hmmm.....guest can you give prevx safeonline a twirl too
here is a free facebook promo http://www.facebook.com/pages/Prevx-SafeOnline/254680228961

 

Thanks but why you didnt test Zemana? all the leaktest are from Zemana?
If you want to try more maybe Comodo, OA would be fine

 

Great test summary. Thanks. Adding Online Armor and Malware Defender into the list would be nice if you get the the time to test them.

 

well he did.....anti logger 1.9.2.172 is zemana

 

Ok, thanks, so how can zemana fails in their own test? The ZE column are the leaktest made by Zemana, no?

 

yes, interesting result. i test it twice but i dont know
you can check it yourself

 

Could you make the test with comodo with and without sandbox?
I would like to know if this keylogers can add security to my config or not

 

Look again - the first six tests are from SpyShelter, only the last two are the Zemana tests.

 

4 test from spyshelter, 4 test spyshelter with ZE tools

 

If you were running the test app as isolated then GW did its job by not allowing critical system access. If that's the case GW passed the tests easily.

 

@guest

Thanks for the tests. I notice you're using which is a private tool. How realistic would this circumvention be in the real world, and is this a well known possible vector in malwareland ?

You might add Trusteer Rapport to the already good suggested apps to test, if you don't mind.

 

Guest, it would be nice if you tested PrivacyKeyboard.

 

also SnooPFree

 

i think anti-keylogger 9.2.1 and privacykeyboard same product.
http://www.anti-keyloggers.com/
http://www.privacykeyboard.com/

is it dead? very old product, only support xp. it is not updated since 2004
http://download.cnet.com/SnoopFree-...00.html?part=111521%20&subj=dlpage&tag=button

if zemana programmers can write, malware writers can too. i think it is realistic.

it is good news

 

Thanks for this test, i have to agree that SpyShelter catch all loggers, actually i run it with other security products and no issue (i just set SpyShelter startup in a delayed start for five seconds because KIS2010 is first .

Memory usage is about 9152 K on windows 7 x64.

Rules

 

From their FAQ:

It would be interesting to see if PK passes the screen capture test.

 

I find strange that a security product accepts for itself a delayed startup. For the rest Spyshelter looks valid. I have to try it.

 

Yep delayed start of spyshelter isn't a problem and can avoid some startup conflicts.
Just one thing, Spyshelter don't have service installed while lot's of real-time security product like kis, a-squared and more get it.


Rules