166 vs 173

Discussion in 'FirstDefense-ISR Forum' started by SourMilk, Mar 14, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SourMilk

    SourMilk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Posts:
    630
    Location:
    Hawaii
    I have used build 173 for awhile now and have forgotten why I upgraded. I know about the compressed snapshots, which I never use, and the VSS plus minor commandline changes 173 contains but is it really worth the upgrade from 166? I recently reverted to RSS and see no difference other than I can now use other virtual shadow programs along side of FDISR. Any comments or advice?

    Thanks, Sourmilk out
     
  2. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    I still use build 166, because space isn't a problem on my computer.
    I can't do anything more with build 173, than saving space.
    I'm waiting for other improvements, like schedules on demand without password and ...
    I never read anything about schedules in this forum, I think nobody wants them, because they aren't practical enough.
     
  3. SourMilk

    SourMilk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Posts:
    630
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Thanks for the reply. I wish they could have more than one frozen snap and or encryption for the regular snaps. But, until then, I think I will reinstall 166. Thanks again.
    Sourmilk out
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.