166 vs 173

Discussion in 'FirstDefense-ISR Forum' started by SourMilk, Mar 14, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SourMilk

    SourMilk Registered Member

    I have used build 173 for awhile now and have forgotten why I upgraded. I know about the compressed snapshots, which I never use, and the VSS plus minor commandline changes 173 contains but is it really worth the upgrade from 166? I recently reverted to RSS and see no difference other than I can now use other virtual shadow programs along side of FDISR. Any comments or advice?

    Thanks, Sourmilk out
  2. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    I still use build 166, because space isn't a problem on my computer.
    I can't do anything more with build 173, than saving space.
    I'm waiting for other improvements, like schedules on demand without password and ...
    I never read anything about schedules in this forum, I think nobody wants them, because they aren't practical enough.
  3. SourMilk

    SourMilk Registered Member

    Thanks for the reply. I wish they could have more than one frozen snap and or encryption for the regular snaps. But, until then, I think I will reinstall 166. Thanks again.
    Sourmilk out
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.