15 Archivers Tested to Find the Fastest Speeds and Smallest File Sizes

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by roger_m, Feb 6, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    From raymond.cc
    15 archivers are tested for compression size and speed.
     
  2. safeguy

    safeguy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    Posts:
    1,795
    Thanks. Personally, it has always been between 7-zip and/or WinRar. I like 7-zip thanks to it being open-source and free price tag but hate the fact it still doesn't make use of ASLR.
     
  3. mattfrog

    mattfrog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Posts:
    85
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Very interesting test - thanks for sharing!

    I take from the report the feeling that 7-zip is good enough to not warrant learning a new tool for the job :cool:
     
  4. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    Yes, 7-Zip does well, but I've never liked the user interface. I'll stick with HaoZip for now because the interface is more like WinRAR's.

    These days I don't need to archive files that much, so I mostly use it for opening archives. I have also used FreeArc a bit due to its good compression rates, when I needed to compress large accounting company files to be less than 10 meg so I could email them.
     
  5. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    I use 7-zip. Great to see it stands pretty well in the result.:)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.