|
|
#1
June 17th, 2005, 09:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
trojan test
just wanted to thank everyone for the great info found here which helped me to pick out best virus/trojan software (kapersky,boclean,tds)
I know it is only one sample, but the following pic is an (in the wild) test on jotti my own scan of the file is as follows tds - trojan trojanhunter - nothing found boclean - trojan (love that single file scan trick) ewido (free) - nothing found Last edited by ronjor : June 18th, 2005 at 06:45 AM. Reason: Resize image |
|
#2
June 18th, 2005, 03:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: trojan test
Did you execute the sample? (Otherwise the test is not valid.)
|
|
#3
June 18th, 2005, 04:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: trojan test
True, a number of AT tests show that most AT's total detection rate depends on a combination of both real time and file scanning.
Ie what a AT may not pick up as a filescan it may pick up when the trojan is executed. |
|
#4
June 18th, 2005, 06:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: trojan test
It's not detected by ewido because it's a Wise Installer which we currently cannot unpack. Once executed the dropped trojan is detected without any problems. Also comparing free to paid versions is really fair...
  |
|
#5
June 18th, 2005, 11:10 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: trojan test
Quote:
What's the difference between the ewido free and pay as far as the detection rate/engine/etc. goes? I would think the pay offers real-time protection and automatic updates, but that the scanning engine and detection rate would still be the same for both...... |
|
#6
June 18th, 2005, 01:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: trojan test
None... The difference is how the nasty gets detected. If the on demand scan fails (e.g. it fails when a trojan is hidden inside a setup like in this case) the guard catches it once it gets dropped and tries to start.
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
