Beta 4 !!!

[puff-m-d]

I just updated to the new Beta 4 and so far so good !!!

Use the update feature in beta 2 or download from here: http://www.nod32.com/download/download.htm.

Regards,
Kent

[LowWaterMark]

There you go again Kent - being the first one to find the new beta.

You sure you aren't actually one of the developers in disguise?

so, how is it??

[the Tester]

Thanks Kent.

I'm downloading it.
I hadn't thought to look for a new beta!

[the Tester]

I ran the new beta 4.

The scan works like it always does.
I did notice a few new items.

There is a progress bar when NOD32 is scanning.
I never noticed this before.

There is a new component or module listed.EMON.
It's MS Outlook/Exchange e-mail protection.

These are nice additions IMO.

[tosbsas]

Anyone has a list of changes??

Is the right click issue fixed?? And the spampal??

Ruben

[marti]

NOD32, beta 4, has the same problem with Trojan Hunter as previous versions. That is, TH "hangs" when checking for updates (the LiveUpdate component) or when calling up the program. As before, if I disable AMON, all TH components work as they should.

That's too bad Marti... That is probably "THE" Thing that is driving me further and further away from NOD32.. Amon and it's conflicts...

[MickeyTheMan]

As soon as system loaded i knew beta 4 still had sockets problem on my sys anyway as it conflicts with spyblocker and i loose connectibity to the net.

[rumpstah]

Did you try the IMON/Setup/Repair Now function? It should fix your issue.

[Blackspear]

What is the difference between Administrator version and standard Beta 4 version, is it just for networks?

Cheers

[MickeyTheMan]

quoting: rumpstah link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=0#53142 date=1048999848]
Did you try the IMON/Setup/Repair Now function? It should fix your issue.

Yes i did without success.
Disabled spyblocker from starting at start up as it was complaining of another app using port 80 as well as Naviscope which was giving an error 10106 (can't create listening sock)
Also changed settings in browser not to use pacfile and naviscope.
Only way to get connectivity back was to disable imon.

[tosbsas]

quoting: marti link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=0#53091 date=1048957936]
NOD32, beta 4, has the same problem with Trojan Hunter as previous versions. That is, TH "hangs" when checking for updates (the LiveUpdate component) or when calling up the program. As before, if I disable AMON, all TH components work as they should.

No problem here when calling the update - whats your system?? I am on win2k 160MbRam but just and old PII 233

Yes it takes a little longer to start the programm as without Nod - I believe they still are fiddeling around with the upx packer

Ruben

[bibbe]

After having had the same problems with ref-updates, as some of the guys in the old NOD32 forum has, I downloaded the NOD beta and for me it works fine on my windows ME, with TDS, BoClean, Adaware and Spybot. Only once I had a problem with AMON eating my physical memory with a speed of 4 megs in 10 seconds, without me working, but after a reboot it stopped and I have had no problems since

bibbe

[marti]

quoting: tosbsas link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=0#53156 date=1049016039]

No problem here when calling the update - whats your system?? I am on win2k 160MbRam but just and old PII 233

Yes it takes a little longer to start the programm as without Nod - I believe they still are fiddeling around with the upx packer

Pentium -- 1 gig; 256MG ram; Win98SE.

The TH LiveUpdate component works with AMON running, but it "hangs" and takes forever to execute compared to running it without AMON active. Same problem with the actual TH program.

[spy1]

Mickey - I'm using SB6.2 and have been using the following version of NOD:

Information on installed NOD32 Antivirus System
Version:***1.387 (20030328)
Virus signature database build:***3575

Information on installed components
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - base
Version:***1.199.14
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - Internet support
Version:***1.199.15
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - NOD32 On-demand Scanner
Version:***1.199.14

Operating system information
Platform:***Windows XP
Version:***5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Version of common control components:***5.82.2800
RAM:***768 MB
Processor:***AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1325 MHz)


No connectivity problems and SB isn't being blocked (prevented from using port 80) by anything (functioning correctly).

Can you post a copy of your "Information"" info from NOD? Pete

[MickeyTheMan]

Information on installed NOD32 Antivirus System
Version:***1.387 (2003032
Virus signature database build:***3575

Information on installed components
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - base
Version:***1.199.14
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - Internet support
Version:***1.199.15
NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - NOD32 On-demand Scanner
Version:***1.199.14

Operating system information
Platform:***Windows 2000
Version:***5.0.2195 Service Pack 3
Version of common control components:***5.81.4916
RAM:***384 MB
Processor:***AMD-K7(tm) Processor (499 MHz)

[puff-m-d]

quoting: LowWaterMark link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=0#53033 date=1048906376]
There you go again Kent - being the first one to find the new beta.

You sure you aren't actually one of the developers in disguise?

LWM,

Just by luck I guess ..... I was running beta 2 and the auto-updater popped up and asked if I wanted the new version. I didn't even have to go looking ...

Regards,
Kent

So far, so good with B4! No connectivity problems but found a strange thing when I ran HiJack This!.

"Broken internet access because of LSP provider "imon.dll" missing"
(imon.dll is there in C:\Windows\System and also in C:\ESET\Setup\02)??

Nothing wrong with my internet access, (DSL), works cause I'm here!
EMail access is working too, using Outlook Exp. 6.0, Eudora, Incredimail.

Had to set up email clients using server address not "localhost" as with POP3 Scan.

Running SpyBlocker 6.2, SSD 1.2, Spyware Blaster and AdShield 3.0 beta. No problems so far.

800 mhz. Celeron, 512 MB RAM, 30 GB HD, on LAN, DSL service.

Information on installed NOD32 Antivirus System
Version:***1.387 (2003032
Virus signature database build:***3575

Information on installed components
NOD32 For Windows 95/98[me=]- base[/me]
Version:***1.199.10
NOD32 For 95/98[me=]- NOD32 On-demand Scanner[/me]
Version:***1.199.10
NOD32 For Windows 95/98[me=]- Internet support[/me]
Version:***1.199.15

Operating system information
Platform:***Windows ME
Version:***4.90.3000
Version of common control components:***5.81.4916
RAM:***504 MB
Processor:***Intel(r) Celeron(tm) processor

If anyone has any thoughts on the quoted info above from HiJack This! please comment.

Thanks
Terry

[MickeyTheMan]

quoting: Terry link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=15#53216 date=1049061978]
So far, so good with B4! No connectivity problems but found a strange thing when I ran HiJack This!.

"Broken internet access because of LSP provider "imon.dll" missing"
(imon.dll is there in C:\Windows\System and also in C:\ESET\Setup\02)??
/quote]
[/

The same thing applies here. As soon as i enable imon, hijackthis gives me that message too. Once imon disabled that message disapears of course

A minor install issue: On older Win9x systems NOD has to replace the vc and mfc runtime libraries. As they are in use by other applications, the installer can's do so and simply exits instead of replacing them on a reboot. To succesfully install NOD you have to replace the libraries by hand... That might confuse "normal" users.

[marti]

quoting: Karl link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=15#53244 date=1049089763]
A minor install issue: On older Win9x systems NOD has to replace the vc and mfc runtime libraries. As they are in use by other applications, the installer can's do so and simply exits instead of replacing them on a reboot. To succesfully install NOD you have to replace the libraries by hand... That might confuse "normal" users.

What are you talking about? I use Win98SE and NOD works fine.

[spy1]

Carl, can you run Hijack This and see if you get the same message?

Mickey, our common control versions are different - is that just because our OS's are different? Pete

[controler]

Win 98 is older than Win98 SE but me is thinking Mickey is running Win 2000 anyway, so Carl's install issue shouldn't apply should it?

[MickeyTheMan]

quoting: spy1 link=board=36;threadid=8137;start=15#53259 date=1049112574]
Mickey, our common control versions are different - is that just because our OS's are different? Pete

I think so.
I also believe that somehow imon.dll does not registewr itself properly to the windows socket service and that the repair option does not fix it either although it says it does. The file is there is system32 folder.
I do run a dual boot system, but the same problem applied to previous betas on both 98SE & win2k.
It dows not matter whether i just activate imon and reloas sys or activate it & repair and reload. As soon as sys reloads, Naviscope can't create listening sock and Spyblocker can't use port 80 and browser looses access to net.