|
|
#1
May 13th, 2005, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
Hi,
I have installed Dr.Web 4.23b in one Laptop PIV, 512MB in RAM, run good, but now like to switch at NOD32 V2.5....Like to know if would be best performace in my Laptop ? Think that NOD32 should use less resources but don't know, really I don't need great protection because we don't surf in Internet just have a lot Email traffic. Thank you, |
|
#4
May 13th, 2005, 06:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
Don't know about Dr. Web.... But Nod32 is the lightest i have used apart from F Prot( Which is the lowest of all )
And NOD32 provide better protection. Do a search on here. As we have discuss this many many times before.
__________________
"Security" is not a Product. Please use "search" first.... especially on the topic resources usage. |
|
#5
May 13th, 2005, 06:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
Quote:
__________________
Primo freebeez: TinyWatcher POP Peeper Kalender |
|
#6
May 13th, 2005, 09:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
BOTH are very light, and I'm not sure, but I think Dr.Web is slightly lighter than NOD32 2.5, but I dont think you are gonna spot any difference in performance, if you compare NOD32 and Dr.Web
Bottom line:- Get either one, and be happy  |
|
#7
May 13th, 2005, 09:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
the lightest would be f-prot.then comes dr web and then nod32.ofcourse all have to be tweaked lil bit to achieve maximum system performance..
all the 3 are generally considered light..
__________________
W!ndow$ and DOS -- a turtle and it's shell (<-- shell.. got it?) I prefer an OS made by programmers that need marketing than an OS made by marketing that need programmers... Use linux powered by ubuntu linux  tweaked to the maaxAMD PHENOM II X4 B50 CPU,790GX MOBO,4 GB RAM,1 TB HDD |
|
#8
May 13th, 2005, 11:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
I found F-Prot heavy. Often it's monitor would chunk my CPU up to 100%. Often, it would lockup games and other things. When I consider a AV light, it means it doesn't bug other programs, doesn't run high CPU times, etc.
Only Dr.Web fit the light bill for me, and i've tried em all. |
|
#9
May 13th, 2005, 11:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
The times I have used f-prot i never noticed that problem, It always ran very light and with no incompatabilities On my comp with any apps that I had installed at the time.
__________________
 The Only Safe Computer Is Unplugged MEMBER ASAP since 2004 Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals |
|
#10
May 14th, 2005, 07:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Dr. Web and NOD32 V2.5
Ive used both on a p3 w98 setup and found them about the same with no noticable slowdown.However on my setup i couldnt get dr webs email scanner to work with my router , properly no matter what i tried.Be sure to trial both before buying.
ellison |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
