Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Archived Forums > Closed Sub-Forums > Archived ESET Support Forums > NOD32 version 2 Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old April 13th, 2005, 12:51 PM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default is this file anything to worry about?

hi

bored today and so thought i'd install kaspersky to see what it is like, currently i'm a very happy nod32 user.

before doing this i ran a full scan with nod32 2.5 beta fully up to date and with settings maxed out, which turned up nothing suspicious. so i downloaded kaspersky, updated it and ran the scanner and it found 5 infected items in a file stored in my firefox cache.

this is the path:

C:\Documents and Settings\*user*\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\b7l0rbu2.default\Cache

I submitted that file to Jotti and it produced the result shown below. of the files listed, i know nod32 detects the 'megasearch' and 'savenow' spyware cos i purposefully downloaded them recently to test what nod did with them (yes, sad, i know), and it did detect and remove the files when i attempted to install.
Not sure about the trojans though.

I was wondering if the reason nod32 doesnt detect threats in this file is because it isnt really a threat? i dont know where i should bother submitting the file to eset or not.

regards, lee
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	jotti.JPG
Views:	197
Size:	96.9 KB
ID:	154541  

__________________
kiss my pig
  #2  
Old April 13th, 2005, 02:18 PM
flyrfan111 flyrfan111 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,224
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

I would suggest you submit them, I believe Jotti submits all missed files to AV makers that miss a detection so I would think Eset already got them, I am not sure if he does this for Adware though.
  #3  
Old April 14th, 2005, 05:40 AM
NOD32 user's Avatar
NOD32 user NOD32 user is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,766
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

They may be non-active components or files that do nothing on their own without the active parts that are not present.
__________________
1. What is right is always The Truth.
2. Every Truth is supported in agreement by every Truth.
3. If the facts would persuade you otherwise, see 1.

ESET Reseller (Australia)
  #4  
Old April 14th, 2005, 05:52 AM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

file sent to eset, thanks to all who replied
__________________
kiss my pig
  #5  
Old April 14th, 2005, 05:58 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

Got it Under progress
  #6  
Old April 14th, 2005, 06:07 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

BTW... the VBA32 detection is a false postive - it flags a WISE Installer DLL as Spyware/Adware this file will not be included into detection cuz it's clean.
  #7  
Old April 14th, 2005, 06:14 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

Ok, the spyware will be nailed soon
Thanks for sending
  #8  
Old April 14th, 2005, 06:28 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

BTW i give you the ultimate trick

This is a self installing ZIP - Executable. Normally you need to start this via double-click... But hey... Wait!

Rename this file from *.exe into *.zip - then browse it - it will work and nothing will be infected - so you can select the good files out of the spyware.

Pretty cool or ?

Don't touch SEARCHTOOLBARBUND.EXE, WUSVINST.EXE and SETUP_INCREDIFIND_ONLY.EXE that's the spyware... The other files you can use Have fun

8^) HB.
  #9  
Old April 14th, 2005, 06:54 AM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Bytes
Rename this file from *.exe into *.zip - then browse it - it will work and nothing will be infected - so you can select the good files out of the spyware.
that is a useful tip, thanks!

so did nod32 just not detect this file as being a threat because it isnt really a threat? or because it needs new signatures?

there is a file in that archive called Wusvinst.exe which nod32 doesnt report as suspicious, but when i run it it then does recognise it as adware (WhenUSave). can it not be recognised before it is installed?

thanks again, Lee
__________________
kiss my pig
  #10  
Old April 14th, 2005, 08:07 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Bytes
Don't touch SEARCHTOOLBARBUND.EXE, WUSVINST.EXE and SETUP_INCREDIFIND_ONLY.EXE that's the spyware...
8^) HB.

*wink*
  #11  
Old April 14th, 2005, 08:52 AM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

oh yeah, i read that - i just was wondering if nod32 should be able to detect that file (and others) as adware without having to run it first (which AMON then stops).
__________________
kiss my pig
  #12  
Old April 14th, 2005, 08:55 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

The missed Spyware will be added
  #13  
Old April 14th, 2005, 09:04 AM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

oh yeah, course..........but i was just wondering - the WUSVINST.EXE file isnt detected my nod32 scanner or imon when downloading it, but it is detected by amon on running it. is it possible for an anti-virus program to detect that it is spyware just from scanning the .exe file, without having to actually double-click to run the install?
__________________
kiss my pig
  #14  
Old April 14th, 2005, 09:19 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rothko
oh yeah, course..........but i was just wondering - the WUSVINST.EXE file isnt detected my nod32 scanner or imon when downloading it, but it is detected by amon on running it. is it possible for an anti-virus program to detect that it is spyware just from scanning the .exe file, without having to actually double-click to run the install?

Do you have archive scan enabled during on-demand scan?
  #15  
Old April 14th, 2005, 09:30 AM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Bytes
Do you have archive scan enabled during on-demand scan?

yeah, but even if i unzip those files to a folder and scan the individual file or the whole folder, it doesnt detect any of the files, even SEARCHTOOLBARBUND.EXE, WUSVINST.EXE and SETUP_INCREDIFIND_ONLY.EXE.
__________________
kiss my pig
  #16  
Old April 14th, 2005, 09:33 AM
Happy Bytes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

LOL i know! That's why i told you will be added
  #17  
Old April 14th, 2005, 09:36 AM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

i'm confused then - i thought if AMON detects WUSVINST.EXE as WhenUSave ADWARE then all other components would be able to detect it too?? do you have to release seperate updates for seperate components then?
__________________
kiss my pig
  #18  
Old April 14th, 2005, 05:38 PM
rothko's Avatar
rothko rothko is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 579
Default Re: is this file anything to worry about?

hi - got the latest update (1.1062) and now the nod32 scanner detects Incredifind.

still curious as to why NOD32 scanner doesnt detect WUSVINST.EXE, but AMON does. Maybe it is me not understanding NOD32 correctly, but I assumed if one module detected a threat then they all did? thanks, lee
 

Wilders Security Forums > Archived Forums > Closed Sub-Forums > Archived ESET Support Forums > NOD32 version 2 Forum « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums