![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
Bacause SpywareBlaster not only cleans existing spyware, but also prevents from installation, it is more complete than Ad-Aware. Also the scanning is much faster. In that condition, why do you recommend to put Ad-Aware in the watch list of FileChecker? My question is not malicious at all. I just want to know whether there is a reason to keep both. Regards, Yinda |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
SpywareBlaster does not clean existing spyware - it ONLY prevents it from being installed, and disables it if the spyware is already installed. Because of that, I strongly recommend that you still use a spyware cleaning program such as Ad-Aware or Spybot S & D. The recommendation is there as an example (but with good reason - at one point, a malicious program tried to edit/remove the ad-aware executable). I also recommend adding Spybot S & D and any other spyware removal/protection programs you have (SpywareBlaster fits into this catagory also). Hope this helps clear some things up. ![]() Regards, -Javacool
__________________
*Official Javacool Software Website* *SpywareBlaster* *Please note: I am not responsible if any advice herein causes any trouble whatsoever *
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok thanks.
I thought that existing spyware are cleaned because SpywareBlaster found some 40 items and, as you say, disabled them. But, after that, Ad-Aware found absolutely nothing. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The list of items is not items it has found, but items that you can protect your computer against. ![]() Regards, -Javacool
__________________
*Official Javacool Software Website* *SpywareBlaster* *Please note: I am not responsible if any advice herein causes any trouble whatsoever *
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
What if the signature list of Ad-Aware is also covered by your database...
![]() Regards, Yinda |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|