Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official Javacool Software Forum > SpywareBlaster & Other Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old November 17th, 2002, 02:22 PM
Yinda Yinda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 78
Default SpywareBlaster vs Ad-Aware

Hi,

Bacause SpywareBlaster not only cleans existing spyware, but also prevents from installation, it is more complete than Ad-Aware. Also the scanning is much faster.

In that condition, why do you recommend to put Ad-Aware in the watch list of FileChecker?

My question is not malicious at all. I just want to know whether there is a reason to keep both.

Regards,

Yinda
  #2  
Old November 17th, 2002, 02:28 PM
javacool javacool is offline
Javacool Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,655
Default Re:SpywareBlaster vs Ad-Aware

Quote:
quoting: Yinda link=board=34;threadid=4965;start=0#32505 date=1037560961]
Hi,

Bacause SpywareBlaster not only cleans existing spyware, but also prevents from installation, it is more complete than Ad-Aware. Also the scanning is much faster.

In that condition, why do you recommend to put Ad-Aware in the watch list of FileChecker?

My question is not malicious at all. I just want to know whether there is a reason to keep both.

Regards,

Yinda

SpywareBlaster does not clean existing spyware - it ONLY prevents it from being installed, and disables it if the spyware is already installed. Because of that, I strongly recommend that you still use a spyware cleaning program such as Ad-Aware or Spybot S & D.

The recommendation is there as an example (but with good reason - at one point, a malicious program tried to edit/remove the ad-aware executable). I also recommend adding Spybot S & D and any other spyware removal/protection programs you have (SpywareBlaster fits into this catagory also).

Hope this helps clear some things up.

Regards,

-Javacool
__________________

*Official Javacool Software Website*
*SpywareBlaster*

*Please note: I am not responsible if any advice herein causes any trouble whatsoever *
  #3  
Old November 17th, 2002, 02:39 PM
Yinda Yinda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 78
Default Re:SpywareBlaster vs Ad-Aware

Ok thanks.

I thought that existing spyware are cleaned because SpywareBlaster found some 40 items and, as you say, disabled them. But, after that, Ad-Aware found absolutely nothing.
  #4  
Old November 17th, 2002, 02:51 PM
javacool javacool is offline
Javacool Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,655
Default Re:SpywareBlaster vs Ad-Aware

Quote:
quoting: Yinda link=board=34;threadid=4965;start=0#32512 date=1037561997]
Ok thanks.

I thought that existing spyware are cleaned because SpywareBlaster found some 40 items and, as you say, disabled them. But, after that, Ad-Aware found absolutely nothing.

The list of items is not items it has found, but items that you can protect your computer against.

Regards,

-Javacool
__________________

*Official Javacool Software Website*
*SpywareBlaster*

*Please note: I am not responsible if any advice herein causes any trouble whatsoever *
  #5  
Old November 17th, 2002, 03:00 PM
Yinda Yinda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 78
Default Re:SpywareBlaster vs Ad-Aware

What if the signature list of Ad-Aware is also covered by your database...

Regards,

Yinda
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official Javacool Software Forum > SpywareBlaster & Other Forum « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2009, Wilders Security Forums