Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Archived Forums > Closed Sub-Forums > Archive of Acronis Support Forums > Acronis True Image Product Line
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Acronis Forum Sections Closed!
As of August 15, 2009: Please be aware that the Acronis Forum sections have closed. No new threads or replies may be made in these sections. See this announcement for more information.
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old September 12th, 2004, 11:23 AM
mantronix mantronix is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default using "higher" compression no recommended ?

Hello,

How come Acronis does NOT recommend that users use anything but "Normal" compression when creating an image ?

I note this comes from the TI 8 manual, does this have anything to do with
the restore time involved if you use a higher compression rate when actually creating the image ?

Are there cons to using higher compression, and should we keep to the "NORMAL " compression setting ?

any help appreciated.
  #2  
Old September 12th, 2004, 01:18 PM
Tipton Tipton is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: using "higher" compression no recommended ?

Where in the manual does it say that Acronis only recommends normal compression? I use minimal compression on all my images. The file creation is faster this way, and I have had no issues using that compression setting.

Tipton
  #3  
Old September 12th, 2004, 05:42 PM
Back me up Scotty
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: using "higher" compression no recommended ?

IMO it depends on the kind of files you want to backup.
Some type of files (mp3, mpg,...) just don't compress.
So it just costs time with no reduced size.
OTOH if you have files that compress well (txt, html, xls, ...) you really will see a diffrence between compression levels.
But the higher the compression level the smaller the gain compared to the previous compression level.

Most systems store files of all types. The mix of them determines the final compression. So I think noone can give real advice on it except tries what works best for your HDs.

Just my 2 cents.
  #4  
Old September 13th, 2004, 09:08 AM
mantronix mantronix is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: using "higher" compression no recommended ?

Good morning,

I guess I thought there was an issue on restoring the image, - ie: if you use a very high compression to create the image, then restoring the image will take MUCH longer because it is so highly compressed.

I just have a feeling this is the case, but I could be wrong.
  #5  
Old September 13th, 2004, 01:46 PM
Back me up Scotty
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: using "higher" compression no recommended ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mantronix
Good morning,

I guess I thought there was an issue on restoring the image, - ie: if you use a very high compression to create the image, then restoring the image will take MUCH longer because it is so highly compressed.

I just have a feeling this is the case, but I could be wrong.

I think that feeling is right.
If high compression was as fast a as none or low Acronis whould have left out the options and set it to high.
Just try a lower setting next time. Then decide if the what you prefer most: speed or size.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Archived Forums > Closed Sub-Forums > Archive of Acronis Support Forums > Acronis True Image Product Line « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums