Comodo 6 screenshots. how's that ?! (preview before beta)

[pintas]

I can't wait to get my hands on that beta...
Looks sooo sweet!

[zfactor]

can anyone tell me if there will be a way to turn off the default deny end of it?

[clocks]

Originally Posted by zfactor

can anyone tell me if there will be a way to turn off the default deny end of it?

Wouldn't turning of D+ (HIPs) effectively do that?

[zfactor]

not real familiar lately with comodo which is why i asked.

[a256886572008]

Originally Posted by zfactor

can anyone tell me if there will be a way to turn off the default deny end of it?

You can untick the "partially limited"

[Dark Shadow]

Quick question please.Is there a way to stop comodo from asking to clean or ignore when something is found.I only want the option of allow or deny from the Hips.

[JoeBlack40]

Originally Posted by djohn

Quick question please.Is there a way to stop comodo from asking to clean or ignore when something is found.I only want the option of allow or deny from the Hips.

Well,i guess these 2 should do the trick.

[Dark Shadow]

I just tried the unrecongized files - cloud, that one did the trick.Thanks JoeBlack.

[JoeBlack40]

Originally Posted by djohn

I just tried the unrecongized files - cloud, that one did the trick.Thanks JoeBlack.

You're very welcome djohn.

[CSKfan]

How does CIS(No antivirus) feel on the system?What about I/O usage?Does it affect web browsing?

[pintas]

Originally Posted by CSKfan

How does CIS(No antivirus) feel on the system?What about I/O usage?Does it affect web browsing?

I guess you're talking about the firewall with D+. It 's really fast. Doesn't affect my web browsing at all.
But to be honest, the difference isn't much with the AV either, at least on my system. Ofcourse the I/O is a little higher, but barely noticeable.

[Dark Shadow]

Same here no slowdowns.Very frienndly on netbook.

[a256886572008]

Originally Posted by djohn

Quick question please.Is there a way to stop comodo from asking to clean or ignore when something is found.I only want the option of allow or deny from the Hips.

1.You can untick this one.

2.If the item is unticked, then the white list checked from the remote server is not accessible.

[Dark Shadow]

Yes thats the one that worked.It was enoying while testing as the hips would popup along with the clean or ignore option.The clean dont work anyways as it always says it was unable to clean.The Hips is good the clean option bites.

[zfactor]

can you guys please let use know when this goes public? id love to test it..

[The Hammer]

Originally Posted by a m i n

i suppose the new GUI is a combination of kaspersky GUI ( main window ) and bitdefender GUI ( settings )

isn't it ?

I'd agree.

[Brandonn2010]

Originally Posted by umbrapolaris

it is the user's interface for the fully virtualized Sandbox.

Fully virtualized sandbox? That sounds very secure.

[KelvinW4]

Originally Posted by Brandonn2010

Fully virtualized sandbox? That sounds very secure.

Like sandboxie.

[umbrapolaris]

Originally Posted by Brocke

yup this next version will crush the paid suites that make you pay for the same features.

and will be hated of jealousy by many ^^

[luciddream]

Originally Posted by pintas

to be honest, the difference isn't much with the AV either, Ofcourse the I/O is a little higher, but barely noticeable.

This is what I hear as well. And why if I ever decide to go back to using a real-time AV, I'll just use the whole CIS suite.

I do wish they'd make a "slim" version for people like me though that already have a perfectly sufficient sandbox (Sandboxie), and don't need other bells & whistles either, including cloud scanning. Just the FW & D+... nothing more. Yes I know you can disable the modules, but even then the product still feels more bloated because it's all still there (device drivers, etc...), just turned off.

And a FW only version for those that want it too.

And even AV/FW/D+, and that's it (no sandbox).

If they provided all of those options they'd corner the market. I'd even pay for it, tailored to my exact needs like that. It'd be worth every penny.

[aigle]

IMO they made a mistake by adding a virutualization for whole desktop. It will raise a lot of issues and bugs i guess. It was better to make virtualization per application like in SBIE. I remember such an option was there in early versions of BZ but it never worked as expected.

Also i don,t like the GUI they have choosen for this virtual desktop, looks like a cheapish copy of iPad GUI. Very childish approach, they could have made a GUI of their own and that would be nice.

[Vladimyr]

Originally Posted by Brocke

yup this next version will crush the paid suites that make you pay for the same features.

Too many medieval RPGs methinks?

[Narxis]

Originally Posted by Brocke

yup this next version will crush the paid suites that make you pay for the same features.

What's your problem with paid AVs? If you don't like them don't buy them and go on with your free AV. I really hate when somebody wanna make a war between products just because he or she can't afford them or doesn't want to pay.

IMHO some paid AVs same features have better quality than the free ones.

[pintas]

Originally Posted by Narxis

What's your problem with paid AVs? If you don't like them don't buy them and go on with your free AV. I really hate when somebody wanna make a war between products just because he or she can't afford them or doesn't want to pay.

IMHO some paid AVs same features have better quality than the free ones.

He was just expressing his opinion, which i find very valid. You need to ask yourself what is your problem with people's opinions instead of asking about other people's problems.

And yes, Comodo will crush the competition
And this is great, this way other companies will need to increase their quality.

[DOSawaits]

I agree, a free, yet such powerful tool like Comodo will only do good to the level of quality of the whole 'security industry'.