![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.webupd8.org/2011/01/how-t...e-2007-in.html
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, thanks
![]() Maybe I'll try it again. But Excel and Access won't work as well, I think. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have you tried this? How does it compare to a windows VM? Everything I read about Wine makes it sound like it's got lots of bugs.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't like Wine. I tried it a while ago but then removed it and its traces which takes a little doing. Among other things, I didn't like how it modified my context menus and sort of took charge of things.
__________________
One can't be too rich, too thin, or too secure |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
sudo apt-get remove --purge wine.1.3 should be all it takes
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
BTW, do you actually use "sudo apt-get remove --purge" ![]()
__________________
One can't be too rich, too thin, or too secure |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes with wine you can run them best is running windows under Vmware without internet
![]()
__________________
Scientific Linux 6.2, xubuntu 11.10 *2x, Linux mint 10, Linux mint 12, opensuse 11.4, windows vista, ubuntu 10.04 and windows xp |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Just removed it. sudo apt-get remove wine1.3 sudo apt-get autoremove
__________________
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I asked about the combination of remove and --purge which seems a bit unusual.
__________________
One can't be too rich, too thin, or too secure |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
sudo apt-get remove <package> (leaves config files behind) sudo apt-get purge <package> (removes everything including config files) sudo apt-get autoremove (removes packages installed but no longer needed on your system) Then there's the --purge option that you can append to other commands. source: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptGet/Howto |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
'apt-get remove --purge' is equivalent to 'apt-get purge'.
Both remove the packages and "purge" configuration files (delete them). 'apt-get purge' is newer i think.
__________________
The GNU Operating System - The GNU Project / Linux Kernel - Linux Foundation / Debian GNU/Linux Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) / The Free Software Foundation (FSF) / Creative Commons (CC) / Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) / Free Software Magazine |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks, didn't know about that one. It's even in the man file... doh. >.< Does purge also remove packages/libraries not used by other programs, like "autoremove"? Or is autoremove like a cleanup utility you run after removal? Quote:
Wonder if that works with Office 2010, must remember to try this soon.
__________________
OpenDNS with DNSCrypt SSD: Windows 8 Pro x64 | IE10 (Enhanced Protected Mode) & Fanboy's TPLs HDD: Xubuntu 12.04 LTS (x64) | Firefox: ABP(Fanboy's list) & HTTPS Everywhere |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Purge only extends the 'apt-get remove' to configuration files.
__________________
The GNU Operating System - The GNU Project / Linux Kernel - Linux Foundation / Debian GNU/Linux Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) / The Free Software Foundation (FSF) / Creative Commons (CC) / Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) / Free Software Magazine |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
I forgot to say, i think aptitude does an "autoremove" by default.
That is, when you remove a package, aptitude "is aware" of which packages were installed only as dependencies, and offers to remove them. I got used to apt-get *shrug*
__________________
The GNU Operating System - The GNU Project / Linux Kernel - Linux Foundation / Debian GNU/Linux Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) / The Free Software Foundation (FSF) / Creative Commons (CC) / Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) / Free Software Magazine |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
AFAIK, aptitude has been depricated and apt-get is preferred now.
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is for stable. I haven't read anything different for Wheezy. aptitude's main disadvantage is lack of Super Cow Powers AFAIK. ![]() Quote:
__________________
The GNU Operating System - The GNU Project / Linux Kernel - Linux Foundation / Debian GNU/Linux Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) / The Free Software Foundation (FSF) / Creative Commons (CC) / Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) / Free Software Magazine |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Definitely not depreciated. It's preferred for a lot of reasons. Aptitude tracks dependencies so when you uninstall it removes them (unless another application needs them, which it'll track.)
The problem is: 1) Apparently it's still screwy for tracking 64bit packages 2) If you switch between apt-get and aptitude a lot it'll mess it up
__________________
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Generally it is recommended not to mix them. IMO, Debian sooner or later has to review this, but perhaps they don't see the point. It's not a problem for me that's for sure, but i remember being new to this, and confused.
__________________
The GNU Operating System - The GNU Project / Linux Kernel - Linux Foundation / Debian GNU/Linux Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) / The Free Software Foundation (FSF) / Creative Commons (CC) / Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) / Free Software Magazine |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
One can't be too rich, too thin, or too secure Last edited by vasa1 : May 21st, 2012 at 01:57 AM. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Didn't I read somewhere that aptitude had started getting developed/bug fixed again?
__________________
OpenDNS with DNSCrypt SSD: Windows 8 Pro x64 | IE10 (Enhanced Protected Mode) & Fanboy's TPLs HDD: Xubuntu 12.04 LTS (x64) | Firefox: ABP(Fanboy's list) & HTTPS Everywhere |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have not come across 'apt-get remove --purge'. If there's a source for it, please link to it. This is what man apt-get throws up:
__________________
One can't be too rich, too thin, or too secure |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
As for removing Wine and traces of it, here's a somewhat old post: http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopi...348950#p348950
I don't know if things have changed since then.
__________________
One can't be too rich, too thin, or too secure |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showp...69&postcount=1
__________________
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|