Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Privacy Related Topics > privacy general
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old May 7th, 2012, 07:13 AM
CloneRanger's Avatar
CloneRanger CloneRanger is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Home usually
Posts: 3,855
Default Forensics to the rescue

Similar techniques used, as in another recent thread, to prove the facts -
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=321470

Quote:
Heartland released a computer forensics report, conducted by Protek International, which states: “We conclude that the Memo did not originate on the Heartland System. It was not created on the Heartland System and was never present there prior to its February 14 posting online.” -http://heartland.org/sites/default/files/protek_heartland_report_-_april_20_2012.pdf

*

Background:

On February 20, Gleick, a prominent climate scientist, confessed to being the anonymous party who obtained confidential corporate documents from The Heartland Institute and circulated them along with a document titled “Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy.” While confessing to using fraud to obtain the stolen documents, he claimed to have received the “climate strategy” memo anonymously in the mail.

Since “Fakegate” occurred, ThinkProgress, Greenpeace, 350.org, and other radical environmental groups have been using the stolen and fake documents to attack Heartland’s corporate donors and the scientists who work with it.

The Protek investigation was conducted by Protek co-founder Daniel Bellich, a 27-year veteran of the FBI and former supervisor of the Chicago Division’s Special Operations Group, and Keith G. Chval, former chief of the High Tech Crimes Bureau of the Illinois Attorney General’s Office and president of the Chicago Chapter of The American Society of Digital Forensics and Electronic Discovery. Both men signed the report on April 20, certifying they would swear to its findings in a court of law.

http://blog.heartland.org/2012/05/ne...arming-scandal
__________________
.
Malware = You don't scare me

A different perspective https://rt.com - https://rt.com/on-air
 

Wilders Security Forums > Privacy Related Topics > privacy general « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums