![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I excluded scanning from all my games and defragger. I also excluded a few files that didn't seem relevant to being scanned repeatedly.
Is that a safe practice? Does real-time scanning affect performance? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
It can do, on occasion, hence the need for exclusion from scanning. What other files did you exclude.
__________________
once we only had ideals, today they are the only things we are missing Microsoft MVP, 2006 - 2013/14 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Excluding any files is not safe. For instance, those files might get infected with a virus and no protection module would report the infection then. If there's a performance problem while scanning certain files, it's better to solve it with the help of Customer care than by excluding the files.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
ESET seems to be the lightest on performance of any I've tried. In fact it's the only one that doesn't bring my older XP machine to it's knees.
I don't even know it's there on the windows 7 machine. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
yeah, that's been the case with ESS on my little AMD Neo powered netbook (1.2GHz single core) - it's the only product i've used on that little guy that doesn't slow its boot time to a crawl or otherwise seriously negatively impact its already sad performance, haha. |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|