Emsisoft Anti-Malware 6.0 released! - Page 3

Jose_Lisbon · #51 October 7th, 2011, 04:27 PM

World Summit Award
Wesleyan Student Assembly
World Steel Association
Westchester Skating Academy
Waikato Society of Arts
Welsh School of Architecture
Williams Syndrome Association

I'm confused... none of this is IT related.

ziaul · #52 October 7th, 2011, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper

Its a great product, and I love having multiple layers of D-FENCE!

Cheers!

KIS not Kaspersky Internet security but Keep it Simple.

By the way WSA is light you should try it and report back.

Cheers!
Ziaul

Trooper · #53 October 7th, 2011, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1chaoticadult

Nothing wrong with multiple layers but I always try not to have overlaps of protection.

So you feel WSA would be an overlap? It does have the firewall. I guess I was looking at it that way.

1chaoticadult · #54 October 7th, 2011, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper

So you feel WSA would be an overlap? It does have the firewall. I guess I was looking at it that way.

I was just saying in general.

ziaul · #55 October 7th, 2011, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper

So you feel WSA would be an overlap? It does have the firewall. I guess I was looking at it that way.

WSA's firewall can co-exist with any firewall, so imho you can run both of them together. Put you have to try it out, you can also use MBAM instead of WSA and still you can get the layered protection.

Best Regards,
Ziaul

Trooper · #56 October 7th, 2011, 04:39 PM

Thanks to both of you guys for the feedback.

I still have the beta of WSA so may try it with that for now and see how it goes!

Cheers and thanks again!

ziaul · #57 October 7th, 2011, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper

Thanks to both of you guys for the feedback.

I still have the beta of WSA so may try it with that for now and see how it goes!

Cheers and thanks again!

You are welcome.

Best Regards,
Ziaul

1chaoticadult · #58 October 7th, 2011, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper

Thanks to both of you guys for the feedback.

I still have the beta of WSA so may try it with that for now and see how it goes!

Cheers and thanks again!

Your welcome.

ziaul · #59 October 7th, 2011, 05:14 PM

If I have both EAM and Online Armor installed do I need to to disable BB in EAM?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers!
Ziaul

1chaoticadult · #60 October 7th, 2011, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ziaul

If I have both EAM and Online Armor installed do I need to to disable BB in EAM?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers!
Ziaul

Either Disable BB in EAM or HIPS in OA. At least I would unless you want both on for some reason, but you don't have to.

ziaul · #61 October 7th, 2011, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1chaoticadult

Either Disable BB in EAM or HIPS in OA. At least I would unless you want both on for some reason, but you don't have to.

Once again thank you.

Best Regards,
Ziaul

1chaoticadult · #62 October 7th, 2011, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ziaul

Once again thank you.

Best Regards,
Ziaul

Your welcome.

Brummelchen · #63 October 7th, 2011, 07:04 PM

Service 158megs
Gui 30megs

win7/32

thats a lot although it runs smooth here.
I have another 8 days of my license - i'll see - and how it is faster than my previous

powerpack · #64 October 7th, 2011, 11:10 PM

@Trooper,

I run WSA with EAM-6 perfectly fine. But I use only WSA antivirus not WSA complete. But I think it won't be problem.

Just exclude WRSA.exe in EAM-6.

P.S: I donot find any exclusion settings in WSA, but If you go WSA>System Tools>Control Active Processes, Start and find Active Processes regarding to Emsisoft and make it Allow.

Thanks,
HP

Noob · #65 October 8th, 2011, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ziaul

If I have both EAM and Online Armor installed do I need to to disable BB in EAM?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers!
Ziaul

Not really necessary but you can do it (I have them both enabled and they work great)

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1chaoticadult

LOL Noob. I don't think Trooper wants that little lag you love some much

SHHHH that's my surprise

ziaul · #66 October 8th, 2011, 02:15 AM

Thank you Noob

Best Regards,
Ziaul

1chaoticadult · #67 October 8th, 2011, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Noob

SHHHH that's my surprise

Haha I was just reminding you

operamail · #68 October 8th, 2011, 07:54 AM

Wonder why did they remove the option to change the installation directory. Though it's not a problem for me, but for some people who'd like install third party software on a non-OS partition, not a good idea.

smage · #69 October 8th, 2011, 09:22 AM

Hi,

Here is a nice review for it.
-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEaAybBQa6U&feature=channel_video_title-

Regards

ctrlaltdelete · #70 October 8th, 2011, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by operamail

Wonder why did they remove the option to change the installation directory. Though it's not a problem for me, but for some people who'd like install third party software on a non-OS partition, not a good idea.

It's still possible to change the installation directory.

See; http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/61...torypartition/

operamail · #71 October 8th, 2011, 10:49 AM

Thanks for the link. It's a workaround, but surely not so user-friendly.

Trooper · #72 October 8th, 2011, 11:51 AM

Tried EAM on my home computer last night. Default installation.

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 with SP1 and fully patched.

I did run it with WSA beta (default installation).

Initial thoughts and observations.

EAM is lighter RAM usage wise than my normal AV suite. That said, it still "feels" heavier. A la it takes longer to open, full scan times were longer etc.

Could not test for malware with it since its my home family shared pc. Will need to do that testing at work in a vm.

Strange thing happened when going to weather.com and espn.com It blocked some connection to blah.blah.com. It was not Google analytics but maybe time time of advertisting block? Not sure. I wish I could have remembered the domain. (It was nothing malicious of course).

I was using both Firefox 7.01 and the latest 14.x of Google Chrome. Firefox had no issues with it but it seemed to mess up my Chrome. After it blocked to let's say server xyz, Chrome was not responding well at all. Java did not work correctly and eventually it crashed the session/browser with a memory could not be read error message.

I'm not sure if there is a setting somewhere within EAM or WSA that I could have flicked on or off, but thought it was weird that it hosed Chrome. That said, my main browser is Firefox and in and of itself had no problems. For now, I had to ditch EAM as this is a family computer and I am the only tech person in the house as that's what I do for a living.

So my question is, has anyone else experienced this weird behavior with Chrome? Also, the popup that EAM showed me were ok with me, but not would not be ok and cause confusion for others when Im not home.

I may continue to test this at work in a VM, but unfortunately its XP as I don't have access to Windows 7 media to install so it won't be an apples to apples comparison.

Thoughts, ideas, and opinions are welcome.

Thanks and cheers!!

1chaoticadult · #73 October 8th, 2011, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper

Tried EAM on my home computer last night. Default installation.

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 with SP1 and fully patched.

I did run it with WSA beta (default installation).

Initial thoughts and observations.

EAM is lighter RAM usage wise than my normal AV suite. That said, it still "feels" heavier. A la it takes longer to open, full scan times were longer etc.

Could not test for malware with it since its my home family shared pc. Will need to do that testing at work in a vm.

Strange thing happened when going to weather.com and espn.com It blocked some connection to blah.blah.com. It was not Google analytics but maybe time time of advertisting block? Not sure. I wish I could have remembered the domain. (It was nothing malicious of course).

I was using both Firefox 7.01 and the latest 14.x of Google Chrome. Firefox had no issues with it but it seemed to mess up my Chrome. After it blocked to let's say server xyz, Chrome was not responding well at all. Java did not work correctly and eventually it crashed the session/browser with a memory could not be read error message.

I'm not sure if there is a setting somewhere within EAM or WSA that I could have flicked on or off, but thought it was weird that it hosed Chrome. That said, my main browser is Firefox and in and of itself had no problems. For now, I had to ditch EAM as this is a family computer and I am the only tech person in the house as that's what I do for a living.

So my question is, has anyone else experienced this weird behavior with Chrome? Also, the popup that EAM showed me were ok with me, but not would not be ok and cause confusion for others when Im not home.

I may continue to test this at work in a VM, but unfortunately its XP as I don't have access to Windows 7 media to install so it won't be an apples to apples comparison.

Thoughts, ideas, and opinions are welcome.

Thanks and cheers!!

Sorry to say I have not experience the same behavior. Not sure whats causing your issue. 5.1 was heavier to me then 6. 6 has been light in my usage. Also did you try excluding EAM in WSA if thats possible?

Brummelchen · #74 October 8th, 2011, 12:34 PM

any reason for a needless full quote?

its "only 32bit here but chrome 15 runs fine with Emsisoft

ziaul · #75 October 8th, 2011, 01:03 PM

Can you try it without WSA? See if it makes any difference.

Best Regards,
Ziaul

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search