|
|
#1
September 28th, 2011, 02:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
On-Demand Comparative August 2011
It's ready, the August on-demand comparative. Surprised by norton
 http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/co...detection-test |
|
#3
September 28th, 2011, 03:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Norton never does that well in on-demand tests since Sonar results wont show here.
Other than that, nice to see so many doing well. Especially im happy about Avira and F-Secure doing well  Trend Micro is rising - MUCH better result this time 
__________________
Many good security options these days
|
|
#4
September 28th, 2011, 03:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
MY MY what happen to Symantech with 57 false positive.I believe they asked it to be tested on high heuristics and yet it missed samples that even avast didn't with only 10 FP.I however take this test with grain of salt.
Nice to see Avira and F-Secure doing well and trend stepping up.
__________________
OS X 10.8.4 - 2.9 GHz Intel core i7 - 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 - 750 SATA HD - Intel HD 4000 Graphics 512 MB. http://www.flickr.com/photos/darkshadow1911/ Last edited by Dark Shadow : September 28th, 2011 at 03:30 PM. |
|
#6
September 28th, 2011, 03:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Quote:
True, but it doesn't affect false positives either, so they would have to be "real" false positives by the autoprotect, as well, not just behaviour fp:s. |
|
#7
September 28th, 2011, 03:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Quote:
__________________
The part of a computer that causes most problems is the bit that holds the mouse! |
|
#8
September 28th, 2011, 03:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Really impressed by avast! Free. Seems their marketing is founded on truth.
__________________
Windows 8 Pro • WSA Complete • Ad Muncher • Image for Windows |
|
#9
September 28th, 2011, 04:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
I'm somewhat surprised by the FP results. I've not seen Symantec produce so many before.
However, I did lol @ MSE's results. Especially considering the product relies so heavily on signatures and seeing it do so poorly. |
|
#10
September 28th, 2011, 04:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Yes they are now testing Panda Cloud! Nice Job Panda
__________________
Panda Security TRUSTED MOD Panda Cloud Antivirus + Rising PC Doctor + Common Sense My Security Blog: http://igl-security.blogspot.com/ |
|
#12
September 28th, 2011, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Not surprised by Avira's excellent performance. Does Qihoo use the Avira engine? Their results are quite similar.
__________________
http://www.free-av.com/ |
|
#13
September 28th, 2011, 04:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
It's finally here. Yes, Qihoo uses Avira now.
Has those multi-engine ones ever been beat?
__________________
|
|
#14
September 28th, 2011, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Quote:
The August 2008 comparative had Avira beating G DATA (I think G DATA was using an older version relative to that time period of the Kaspersky engine during that time. I don't remember for sure though.)
__________________
http://www.free-av.com/ |
|
#16
September 28th, 2011, 05:24 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Not bad for trustport. 99.6% is pretty good. The 59 FP might be a problem though.
__________________
Realtime: WSA AV (Maxed Settings), Sandboxie Paid ( Dropmyrights and Browsers sandboxed) Lifetime license, NVT EXE Radar Pro (Lockdown mode). K9 Web protection. (malware, phishing and HTTPS force) Norton DNS. On-Demand: MBAM+EAM Hitman pro (Scans daily) |
|
#17
September 28th, 2011, 05:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
There is always good times and bad times and it seems like NIS is going through that phase. I am sure they will improve their scores in the next round of testing.
Best Regards, Ziaul |
|
#18
September 28th, 2011, 05:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Quote:
The problem is with AVG engine which has many Fp´s. Regards |
|
#20
September 28th, 2011, 06:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Yeah Panda Cloud had some good results and it is Cloud based
G-Data performed well, Norton as always average on On Demand tests but this time they took the prize for the worst performer  Are you sure they didn't use something like Norton Power Eraser? JKJK
__________________
Emsisoft Anti-Malware v7.0.0.21 - Online Armor 6.0.0.1736 SRP - UAC - EMET Browser: Google Chrome v25.xx Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
|
#21
September 28th, 2011, 06:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Quote:
Riding that train again eh? 
__________________
This space for rent. |
|
#22
September 28th, 2011, 06:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Avira - back on top .. wow
Avg -  Avast - Norton - lol Panda - Mse -  
__________________
7 x64 Pro + WSA + Mbam Free + HMP + Shadowdefender + Macrium free |
|
#23
September 28th, 2011, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Norton is a real surprise. It did so well in the Whole Product Tests, but fell down on this one. I wonder why the difference?
Jerry
__________________
Laptop W 7 64 bit - Avast Pro 8, W 7 Firewall, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time. Desktop W7 64 bit -KIS 2013, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time. |
|
#25
September 28th, 2011, 07:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: On-Demand Comparative August 2011
Quote:
__________________
|
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
