Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official ESET Support Forum > ESET Home Users Products Forum > ESET Smart Security
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old January 11th, 2011, 02:33 AM
zonebie's Avatar
zonebie zonebie is offline
Infrequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Default configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

are there any configuration keys for nob32 that will make it work at its optimal performance.
  #2  
Old January 11th, 2011, 02:40 AM
agoretsky's Avatar
agoretsky agoretsky is offline
Eset Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 3,897
Default Re: configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

Hello,

The default settings are the optimal ones.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
__________________
Resources: ESET · blog · documentation · FAQs · knowledge base · news · RSS · signature updates · support · Threat Center · @ESETNA (Twitter) · YouTube: ESETKnowledgebase · VirusRadar
Fun Stuff: Facebook (global) · Facebook (US) · @ESET (Twitter) · YouTube: esetusa
  #3  
Old January 11th, 2011, 01:48 PM
Pain of Salvation's Avatar
Pain of Salvation Pain of Salvation is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 342
Default Re: configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

What about smart (intelligent) optimization etc.? Is it enabled by default?
__________________
Windows 8 Pro x64 - Appguard - HitmanPro - Shadow Defender
  #4  
Old January 11th, 2011, 01:55 PM
toxinon12345's Avatar
toxinon12345 toxinon12345 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Managua, Nicaragua
Posts: 1,134
Default Re: configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pain of Salvation
What about smart (intelligent) optimization etc.? Is it enabled by default?
Yes, it is enabled by default in On-access scanners and Smart Scan Profile (on-demand).
__________________
Pentium M| 512 RAM
ESET NOD32 Antivirus 5
ESET Smart Security 6 RC
  #5  
Old January 11th, 2011, 02:37 PM
Matthijs5nl
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by agoretsky
Hello,

The default settings are the optimal ones.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
So you consider enabled detection Potentially Unwanted Programs (during install) and keeping detection of Potentially Unsafe Programs disabled as the optimall settings?

You guys could by the way consider to include the option to enable detection of Potentially Unsafe Programs in the installer, so you have two PUP options on one installer page.
  #6  
Old January 11th, 2011, 02:52 PM
toxinon12345's Avatar
toxinon12345 toxinon12345 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Managua, Nicaragua
Posts: 1,134
Default Re: configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthijs5nl
So you consider enabled detection Potentially Unwanted Programs (during install) and keeping detection of Potentially Unsafe Programs disabled as the optimall settings?

PUsA is disabled by default. PUwA setting is user-dependant at installation process. This categories are usually for detecting grayware.
Definitely: add a check box to enable PUsA during EAV / ESS setup. (It was added to the wishlist by many users including me)
__________________
Pentium M| 512 RAM
ESET NOD32 Antivirus 5
ESET Smart Security 6 RC

Last edited by toxinon12345 : January 11th, 2011 at 03:20 PM.
  #7  
Old January 11th, 2011, 03:00 PM
Matthijs5nl
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: configuration piece for optimal performance and protection

Quote:
Originally Posted by toxinon12345
PUsA is disabled by default. PUwA setting is user-dependant at installation process. This categories are usually for detecting grayware.
Yes, indeed. I should have written my question more carefully.

I am wondering what is the reason why to include an option for PUwA (which I think most people enable detection for) in the installer, and not for PUsA? Does ESET consider PUwA as more effective? Or does ESET consider PUsA to be causing too many false positives?

I am wondering because they are indeed for detecting greyware. But the most important threat category nowadays is in my opinion fake security/rogue software. Which is greyware, really hard to differentiate from legimate software.
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official ESET Support Forum > ESET Home Users Products Forum > ESET Smart Security « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums