SUPERAntiSpyware 5.x

[Mops21]

Hi

Here are two links for the 5.0 of SAS with pictures

http://forums.superantispyware.com/i...re-50-preview/

http://forums.superantispyware.com/i...re-50-preview/

[JoeBlack40]

Originally Posted by Mops21

Hi

Here are two links for the 5.0 of SAS with pictures

http://forums.superantispyware.com/i...re-50-preview/

http://forums.superantispyware.com/i...re-50-preview/

I've got a 403 forbidden........

[SIR****TMG]

Looks great

[cheater87]

Beautiful

[firzen771]

looks nice, SAS was def needing a major revamp

[Mops21]

Originally Posted by JoeBlack40

I've got a 403 forbidden........

The Links are working fine

[andylau]

Originally Posted by JoeBlack40

I've got a 403 forbidden........

Me too, maybe our ISP/country is blocked by it. I change an DNS can go there

[hayc59]

Here ya go

[eugene91]

Looks nice

[SUPERAntiSpy]

Thank you The window is fully resizable as well. We have new real-time, new scheduler, new update scheduler, new faster quarantine, faster scanning, smaller definitions (faster downloading) and many more improvements.

[1chaoticadult]

Looks good

Now only if they can change/update their 1980's bug logo.

[clocks]

Originally Posted by SUPERAntiSpy

Thank you The window is fully resizable as well. We have new real-time, new scheduler, new update scheduler, new faster quarantine, faster scanning, smaller definitions (faster downloading) and many more improvements.

Sounds very nice. Hopefully you can accomplish everything while keeping the program lightweight to use.

Looks great!

[sg09]

Indeed looks great. When will this be released?

[Daveski17]

Well normally, I worry about change, SAS is a superb product though, I can't praise it enough. The new interface looks great. I've always had a lot of faith in SAS.

[SUPERAntiSpy]

Originally Posted by clocks

Sounds very nice. Hopefully you can accomplish everything while keeping the program lightweight to use.

It's much lighter than our current version

[kjdemuth]

How are detections and heuretics?

[Securon]

Good Scaryween ! The new Graphics are very smart...very smart indeed. Can hardly wait for 5.0. Sincerely...Securon

Originally Posted by kjdemuth

How are detections and heuretics?

SAS failed in nearly all MRG tests

[Boyfriend]

SUPERAntiSpyware 5.0 looks very beautiful I hope that they will improve its detection rates even better.

[jmonge]

time will tell

[Victek123]

Originally Posted by control

SAS failed in nearly all MRG tests

Can you say more about this? I've used SAS in malware cleanups with good results. The only problem I have with it is the "Quick Scan" isn't. I usually use MBAM first because the Quick Scan is faster, but SAS sometimes finds things MBAM doesn't plus it has the Repair feature (for undoing various problems such as being unable to display the task manager).

[SUPERAntiSpy]

Originally Posted by Victek123

Can you say more about this? I've used SAS in malware cleanups with good results. The only problem I have with it is the "Quick Scan" isn't. I usually use MBAM first because the Quick Scan is faster, but SAS sometimes finds things MBAM doesn't plus it has the Repair feature (for undoing various problems such as being unable to display the task manager).

MRG tests on a small set of samples, it's not a comprehensive test - MRG does a great job but there is only so much they can test - meaning they test against a set of samples - we may not get all of those samples, but we get many of the samples that others miss - being a "testing facility" is very difficult - meaning the only way to really test an application is to test it over a long period of time against infections on actual computers, not just "samples". MRG is also very helpful to companies such as ours - they work WITH us to help protect the users.

As for our Quick Scan - it will be much faster in 5.0 - BUT - think of it this way - if you were having your heart operated on, would you want someone who just does a "fast job" but doesn't fix the problem, or would you want someone who took the time to do the job right? That's one thing that I have never understood about end users and scanning time - do you want the infection removed, or simply a fast scan time? What does a fast scan time really get you when you are talking the difference of minutes?

We also have our Critical Point Scan for Professional users - this will do a VERY quick check of your system.

We will also be expanding our repairs in later releases after the initial 5.0 release.

[ParadigmShift]

How will v5.0 do with complete removal of TDL4?