Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Official Paragon Support Forum > Paragon Partition Manager Product Line
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old July 12th, 2010, 09:00 PM
Anakunda's Avatar
Anakunda Anakunda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Thumbs down Pathetic speeds on partition restore

Hello,

I m cruely disappointed by restoring speeds, which was 2MB/s in average, by doing restore of almost full 64GB partition it took around 9hours (!!!!) from differential backup. While backing up (diff) the same partition took about an 1.5 hour (max compression). I don't wee a reason for such a slow progress since decompression always is faster than compression....terrible speed
  #2  
Old July 14th, 2010, 03:55 PM
SIW2 SIW2 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,480
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

My restores usually take around the same time as the backup.

Were you doing a file level restore ? They can be slow. Normal image restore is much faster.
  #3  
Old July 14th, 2010, 04:08 PM
Anakunda's Avatar
Anakunda Anakunda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIW2
My restores usually take around the same time as the backup.

Are you doing from differential backups?

Since that makes the difference.
It can be seen on verify backup integrity task too.
Normal image goes relative fast (up to 1hr), while differential image goes very very slow (around 9hrs). Although it may take an extra time to synthetize with base image, it can't be 9x slower !!! And it's CPU what is exhausted, not the drive.
  #4  
Old July 29th, 2010, 12:25 PM
Paragon_Tommy's Avatar
Paragon_Tommy Paragon_Tommy is offline
Paragon Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 918
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

You can tell if you're doing a file-level restore as opposed to a sector level restore when file listings are scrolling as you restore. This indicates that either the original container of the backup is larger than the target container, or during the restore wizard, you expanded the partition to restore at a file-level.

From testing, file-level restore goes about 5x slower than sector restore. Of course your bus-speed also effects this.
  #5  
Old July 29th, 2010, 01:20 PM
Anakunda's Avatar
Anakunda Anakunda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paragon_Tommy
You can tell if you're doing a file-level restore as opposed to a sector level restore when file listings are scrolling as you restore. This indicates that either the original container of the backup is larger than the target container, or during the restore wizard, you expanded the partition to restore at a file-level.

From testing, file-level restore goes about 5x slower than sector restore. Of course your bus-speed also effects this.


I don't think so, the partition matches size exactly and restore in default mode, backup is not raw sector. I don't know what you mean file-level restore.
  #6  
Old July 29th, 2010, 05:31 PM
Paragon_MattK's Avatar
Paragon_MattK Paragon_MattK is offline
Paragon Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 176
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

A file-level restore would mean that the archive is restored by looking at each file individually, as opposed to simply restoring the data sector-by-sector, as Tommy mentioned, this is required when restoring an image to a smaller disk.

However, you mentioned that this is a differential backup, this could definitely be the cause of the poor performance.

Is the base image and the differential image in the same storage location?

How large is the differential compared to the base image?
  #7  
Old July 29th, 2010, 06:12 PM
Anakunda's Avatar
Anakunda Anakunda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

Then it wasnot file-level restore.

Yes the base and differential are in the same folder (USB HDD)
Approximate sizes were ~25 GB(base) and 5-15 GB(diff), don't remember yet

Is the difference in restoral speed between regular and diff backup really so big?
IMO this makes this otherwise useful solution almost unusable for effective restoral as it takes almost half a day with average CPU.

here is the script to generate the differential image, if there's something causing the restoral so slow please give me to know

Code:
// Differential system backup // Time of creation: Tue Mar 02 12:26:53 2010 // Settings block settings surfacetest off verify off copyonetoone off hddrawprocess off allow64kcluster off donothidetarget on copyinsteadofmove off bigdrives off compressionlevel 2 sidafterdisk off sidafterpartition off defaultsidchanger on nodellabel off timeshift 60 oemcodepage 852 timezone 24 langnumber 8 slavecfg off notforslave off enablerestart on enablevirtualdb on autoconverttofat32 on sidparams "" hotbackup lockimpossible tempdrive Y vss2hbswitch on vssattempts 4 vsstimeout 120 endsettings confirm off // Backup img = "Y:/backup/img_0_$(YEAR)_$(MONTH)_$(DAY)_$(HOUR)_$(MINUTE).PBF" select first track 0 options cmp = 2 pwd = "**********" label = "Scheduled System Backup - HDD First Track $(DAY).$(MONTH).$(YEAR) $(HOUR):$(MINUTE):$(SECOND)" autonames hotbackup lockimpossible tempdrive Y usevss store call check_error // Backup img = "Y:/backup/diff_1_$(YEAR)_$(MONTH)_$(DAY)_$(HOUR)_$(MINUTE).pbf" base = "Y:/backup/img_1.pbf" select disk 0 select partition primary 0 options cmp = 2 pwd = "**********" notempfiles label = "Scheduled System Backup - Windows System Volume $(DAY).$(MONTH).$(YEAR) $(HOUR):$(MINUTE):$(SECOND)" autonames base_pwd = "**********" hotbackup lockimpossible tempdrive Y usevss exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/Temp/" exclude = "C:/Windows/Temp/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary Internet Files/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/Mozilla/Firefox/Profiles/nupqji1i.default/Cache/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/Opera/Opera/cache/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/Google/Chrome/User Data/Default/Cache/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/Apple Computer/Safari/Cache.db" exclude = "C:/Program Files (x86)/Direct Connect/FileLists/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/Application Data/Adobe/Common/Media Cache Files/" exclude = "C:/$RECYCLE.BIN/" exclude = "C:/MSOCache/" exclude = "C:/ProgramData/Microsoft/Search/Data/Temp/" exclude = "C:/Users/Default/AppData/Local/Temp/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/Local Settings/Microsoft/Windows/Explorer/thumbcache*.db" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Roaming/XnView/XnView.db" exclude = "C:/ProgramData/Apple/Installer Cache/" exclude = "C:/ProgramData/Apple Computer/Installer Cache/" exclude = "C:/Users/Anakunda/AppData/Local/CrashDumps/" store call check_error // Merge archives into one archive img = "Y:/backup/backup_$(YEAR)_$(MONTH)_$(DAY)_$(HOUR)_$(MINUTE).pbf" img = "Y:/backup/img_0_$(YEAR)_$(MONTH)_$(DAY)_$(HOUR)_$(MINUTE).pbf" img = "Y:/backup/diff_1_$(YEAR)_$(MONTH)_$(DAY)_$(HOUR)_$(MINUTE).pbf" options label = "Backed up on $(DAY).$(MONTH).$(YEAR) $(HOUR):$(MINUTE):$(SECOND)" store complex call check_error apply all call check_error // Function for checking error check_error: if (errorcode(1) != 0) then print "Some error occured: " strerror(errorcode(1)) print "" print "Exiting" print "" exit(errorcode(1)) endif endcall



thanks

Last edited by Anakunda : July 29th, 2010 at 06:18 PM.
  #8  
Old September 13th, 2010, 02:36 AM
Anakunda's Avatar
Anakunda Anakunda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

Greetings,

performed another restore from differential image today which confirmed the slowness reported in first post.

Here are today's results:

Partition size: 64 GB
Effective data to restore excluding OS auxilioary files: 48.9 GB
Used devices:
source: USB2 external SATA-II @ Oxford 7200RPM 32MB cache
target: SATA-II 5400RPM 8MB cache
Total restore time: 8h16m
Restore kernel used: at bluescreen
Average restoral speed: ~5.9 GB/h (ie. 1.68 MB/s)
CPU: Intel C2D 2.2 GHz

Check of the same image under Windows took less than 1hr

Could more users or Paragon techs post their results to see if this speed is normal?
  #9  
Old September 13th, 2010, 08:03 AM
SIW2 SIW2 is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,480
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

It's not normal.


Paragon should always be quicker than Windows System image.

I would expect 48.9gb to take between 35 and 45 minutes, depending on your machine.
  #10  
Old September 13th, 2010, 08:08 AM
Anakunda's Avatar
Anakunda Anakunda is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default Re: Pathetic speeds on partition restore

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIW2
It's not normal.


Paragon should always be quicker than Windows System image.

I would expect 48.9gb to take between 35 and 45 minutes, depending on your machine.


hmm then there's something odd.
I would say so since the average (differential) backu of the same partition takes between 75-90 minutes
I am using password to protect, does this matter?
Tha backup drive average speed is less than 35MB/s due to USB2 lmiitations, but this shouldnot matter.
The compression is set to high.

Any diagnostics to find the culprit?
 

Wilders Security Forums > Official Paragon Support Forum > Paragon Partition Manager Product Line « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums