![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hello,
I m cruely disappointed by restoring speeds, which was 2MB/s in average, by doing restore of almost full 64GB partition it took around 9hours (!!!!) from differential backup. While backing up (diff) the same partition took about an 1.5 hour (max compression). I don't wee a reason for such a slow progress since decompression always is faster than compression....terrible speed |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
My restores usually take around the same time as the backup.
Were you doing a file level restore ? They can be slow. Normal image restore is much faster. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Are you doing from differential backups? Since that makes the difference. It can be seen on verify backup integrity task too. Normal image goes relative fast (up to 1hr), while differential image goes very very slow (around 9hrs). Although it may take an extra time to synthetize with base image, it can't be 9x slower !!! And it's CPU what is exhausted, not the drive. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
You can tell if you're doing a file-level restore as opposed to a sector level restore when file listings are scrolling as you restore. This indicates that either the original container of the backup is larger than the target container, or during the restore wizard, you expanded the partition to restore at a file-level.
From testing, file-level restore goes about 5x slower than sector restore. Of course your bus-speed also effects this.
__________________
Paragon Software Group |Knowledge Base |Sign in Account |Update & Upgrade Center |Product Manuals |Submit a Ticket |Scripting Manual |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't think so, the partition matches size exactly and restore in default mode, backup is not raw sector. I don't know what you mean file-level restore. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
A file-level restore would mean that the archive is restored by looking at each file individually, as opposed to simply restoring the data sector-by-sector, as Tommy mentioned, this is required when restoring an image to a smaller disk.
However, you mentioned that this is a differential backup, this could definitely be the cause of the poor performance. Is the base image and the differential image in the same storage location? How large is the differential compared to the base image?
__________________
Paragon Software Group | Knowledge Base | Sign in Account | Update & Upgrade Center | Product Manuals | Submit a Ticket | Scripting Manual |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Then it wasnot file-level restore.
Yes the base and differential are in the same folder (USB HDD) Approximate sizes were ~25 GB(base) and 5-15 GB(diff), don't remember yet Is the difference in restoral speed between regular and diff backup really so big? IMO this makes this otherwise useful solution almost unusable for effective restoral as it takes almost half a day with average CPU. here is the script to generate the differential image, if there's something causing the restoral so slow please give me to know Code:
thanks Last edited by Anakunda : July 29th, 2010 at 06:18 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Greetings,
performed another restore from differential image today which confirmed the slowness reported in first post. Here are today's results: Partition size: 64 GB Effective data to restore excluding OS auxilioary files: 48.9 GB Used devices: source: USB2 external SATA-II @ Oxford 7200RPM 32MB cache target: SATA-II 5400RPM 8MB cache Total restore time: 8h16m Restore kernel used: at bluescreen Average restoral speed: ~5.9 GB/h (ie. 1.68 MB/s) CPU: Intel C2D 2.2 GHz Check of the same image under Windows took less than 1hr Could more users or Paragon techs post their results to see if this speed is normal? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's not normal.
Paragon should always be quicker than Windows System image. I would expect 48.9gb to take between 35 and 45 minutes, depending on your machine. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
hmm then there's something odd. I would say so since the average (differential) backu of the same partition takes between 75-90 minutes I am using password to protect, does this matter? Tha backup drive average speed is less than 35MB/s due to USB2 lmiitations, but this shouldnot matter. The compression is set to high. Any diagnostics to find the culprit? |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|