Wilders Security Forums  

Go Back   Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other firewalls
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old August 4th, 2010, 11:28 AM
JerryM JerryM is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,972
Default HIPS vs Pure Firewall

Although I have addressed it in various threads I have never receoved an answer that I can understand.

Firewalls such as LooknStop are called pure firewalls evidently. I take that to mean no HIPS. Online Armor on the other hand is a HIPS firewall.

I have used both without problems or slowdowns as far as I can determine.

So why would not one always go with a HIPS firewall if it did not cause problems with his system. Would not the HIPS firewall add to overall security?
Thanks.

Regards,
Jerry
__________________
Laptop W 7 64 bit - Avast Pro 8, W 7 Firewall, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time.
Desktop W7 64 bit -KIS 2013, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time.
  #2  
Old August 4th, 2010, 11:52 AM
King Grub's Avatar
King Grub King Grub is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 756
Default Re: HIPS vs Pure Firewall

It does, but it can also mean that the user has to be prepared to take more time configure the HIPS program, and in many cases it can mean dealing with decisions regarding what application is allowed to do what, something the average user might not be capable of or interested in doing.

If I installed a HIPS on my mom's computer and it asked her if application X was allowed to load the MSICPL.sys driver, would she be able to determine if it should or shouldn't be allowed to do so?
  #3  
Old August 4th, 2010, 12:44 PM
kjdemuth's Avatar
kjdemuth kjdemuth is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,340
Default Re: HIPS vs Pure Firewall

Useability is one of the greatest concerns with HIPS firewalls. A lot of people don't want to answer 2-3 prompts for a program to run. Some other folks already have a resident BB or HIPS and only need a firewall. Its all a matter of configuring a setup that works for you.
__________________
Realtime:
WSA AV (Maxed Settings), Sandboxie Paid ( Dropmyrights and Browsers sandboxed) Lifetime license, NVT EXE Radar Pro (Lockdown mode). K9 Web protection. (malware, phishing and HTTPS force) Norton DNS.
On-Demand:
MBAM+EAM
Hitman pro (Scans daily)
  #4  
Old August 4th, 2010, 02:16 PM
bellgamin's Avatar
bellgamin bellgamin is offline
Very Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 5,202
Default Re: HIPS vs Pure Firewall

Also, some folks prefer separate apps -- a pure FW (Look'n'Stop for example) plus a classic HIPS (Malware Defender for example).

Other possibilities include:
1- Pure FW plus *Specialized Security App* (SpyShelter, for example -- a powerful antikeylogger plus pretty good system protection along the lines of a specialized HIPS)

2- Pure FW plus Behavior Blocker (Mamutu for example)

3- Pure FW plus antiexec-type app (PE Guard for example)

4- Pure FW plus isolationist-type app (App Guard for example)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Which of the above combos is best...
+ for a skilled computer geek who loves to tinker?
+ for my maiden aunt who has NO idea about computer security?
+ for a fairly skilled computer user who wants good security but without a whole bunch of bother?
+For use in a classroom or kiosk situation?

I have perfect knowledge of all the necessary information (provided, of course, that no one asks me any questions.)
__________________
Primo freebeez: TinyWatcher POP Peeper Kalender
  #5  
Old August 4th, 2010, 02:26 PM
JerryM JerryM is offline
Massive Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,972
Default Re: HIPS vs Pure Firewall

Thanks, All. That helps a lot.
Regards,
Jerry
__________________
Laptop W 7 64 bit - Avast Pro 8, W 7 Firewall, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time.
Desktop W7 64 bit -KIS 2013, Win Patrol Pro, and MBAM Pro in real time.
  #6  
Old August 5th, 2010, 08:49 PM
lonelywolf's Avatar
lonelywolf lonelywolf is offline
Regular Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 73
Default Re: HIPS vs Pure Firewall

Kerio Personal Firewall 2.1 ( free ) with some hips, for instance defensewall 2.56
Very light.
__________________
Shadow Defender Outpost Firewall Pro
VirusTotal Uploader
  #7  
Old August 5th, 2010, 11:31 PM
dcrowe0050's Avatar
dcrowe0050 dcrowe0050 is offline
Frequent Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 378
Default Re: HIPS vs Pure Firewall

I think a lot of people would rather use separate stand alone apps like was said above. I also know that there are some, even if they are few, that do not believe in HIPS components, or do not need them due to their location or setup, whether they are on a laptop and travel around a lot, etc. And of course the majority of people just install what they are told to install and do not question it much at all.
__________________
"The only real security that a man can have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability"

"Only two things in the world are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity, and nobody seems to be sure of the former"

 

Wilders Security Forums > Security Products > other firewalls « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002 - 2013, Wilders Security Forums