![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is drawn from Crazy.. in the excellent stickies at the top of this forum. My question is are these ports the same in Windows 7 FW 2 way ? If not what are the new values
__________________
Escalader ![]() i7 8 GB RAM Notebook, 1TB External Drive Sandboxie, Nod32, OP FW Pro, KeyScrambler, MVPS HOSTS File IE 9 Hardened Active X,SmartScreen,Tracking Protection Paragon Backup and Imaging |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, they will be the same.
see for correct answer below
__________________
once we only had ideals, today they are the only things we are missing Microsoft MVP, 2006 - 2013/14 Last edited by Cudni : June 23rd, 2010 at 04:42 PM. Reason: correction |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Actually, no. The default ephemeral range has been changed in Vista, see here.
Quote:
Try this on W7, I bet it's the same as Vista.
__________________
Nick |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Does the Windows 7 firewall allow for entering port ranges? Vista only appears to permit specifying a port or list of ports. A list from 49152 to 65535 would be a little cumbersome weeNym |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'll check this one out. BTW, some 3rd party FW's do not allow users to put in a condition for local ports so we should use this security feature as one of our selection criteria for these products. The question to put to vendors is do you default to the windows x Ephemeral Ports or allow any port(s)?
__________________
Escalader ![]() i7 8 GB RAM Notebook, 1TB External Drive Sandboxie, Nod32, OP FW Pro, KeyScrambler, MVPS HOSTS File IE 9 Hardened Active X,SmartScreen,Tracking Protection Paragon Backup and Imaging |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What do you mean? This screenshot is from W7 (sorry for the "ugliness", it is a VM) and the example (I pointed out) clearly states that ranges are supported -
__________________
Nick |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nick: Thanks for that VM! Could you post a filled in one for IE or FF etc showing us what we need ephemeral wise? ![]() The tightening up on browsers is NB for FW's at least for me! If you are too busy don't worry about it just for me.
__________________
Escalader ![]() i7 8 GB RAM Notebook, 1TB External Drive Sandboxie, Nod32, OP FW Pro, KeyScrambler, MVPS HOSTS File IE 9 Hardened Active X,SmartScreen,Tracking Protection Paragon Backup and Imaging |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Emsisoft AntiMalware Jetico Personal FireWall SpyShelter Premium MBAM Pro SuRun Sandboxie DiskCryptor Tiny Watcher Acrylic DNS Acronis Win7 x64 Favs: AAI ACLU AHA EFF FFRF Riseup | AHK DOpus foobar2000 LibreOffice | Celtic Frost Satyricon SFU Slayer Venom |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
With Vista, you can only enter a port or list of ports. I doubt you would want to try and enter the ephemeral port range as a list. Quote:
weeNym Last edited by weeNym : June 25th, 2010 at 01:50 AM. Reason: added screenshot |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
weeNym |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Oh, I see. I was not aware of that. After a little research on MS Technet, it turns out that Vista firewall will not filter port ranges even with netsh command parameters - Quote:
Quote from here. Oh well. Cheers,
__________________
Nick |
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|