Dual Profiles Mirror/Internet

[Fransb]

i got the same problem: im using a internal mirror (share) and the internet update,

the first profile is the mirror, and the 2nd the internet update.

when i stop sharing my mirror, i think the internet update should have to take over (because when i use laptops they also cant find the share, if they are out of office.)




http://i40.tinypic.com/9hl6hs.jpg


http://i41.tinypic.com/2md5s2v.jpg


When i stop sharing my mirror and i want to update it i get this

http://i42.tinypic.com/2mn215c.png


does someone has a solution?

[briwlls]

I agree, it should be automatic if the share/mirror is not available ESET should automatically default to the internet update profile, but for me it doesn't either.

In a post on this same subject Marcos stated that user needs to select the "Internet Update" task, I don't know about you most end users will never do this.

I need to find a way to make this automatic.

[elmolincoln]

Try this if you are using ERAC...works great for us.

http://kb.eset.com/esetkb/index?page...=1270148189732

[briwlls]

Found my issue, I was testing by forcing an update now, the article is a scheduled task every 60 minutes so a forced update does not enact the scheduled task.

All is well.

Thank you,
Brian

[Fransb]

Ow, so you mean that if i push update now it doesnt enact a scheduled, so if i throw out the mirror, and let it off for lets say 1 day, it will update via the other profile.

[briwlls]

A cleaner way to explain, if the laptop leaves the LAN/Office/Mirror and is on their home internet or any connection for that matter, the 60 minute update interval will fail to reach the mirror automatically triggering the task to update from ESET directly.

[Fransb]

Originally Posted by briwlls

A cleaner way to explain, if the laptop leaves the LAN/Office/Mirror and is on their home internet or any connection for that matter, the 60 minute update interval will fail to reach the mirror automatically triggering the task to update from ESET directly.

Yeh thanks man for the information .


i tested it also in a test area and it worked like you said , thanks